Results of President Obama's Race to the Top

Autor/in	Howell, William G.
Titel	Results of President Obama's Race to the Top
Quelle	In: Education Next, 15 (2015) 4, S.58-66 (9 Seiten) PDF als Volltext Verfügbarkeit
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
ISSN	1539-9664
Schlagwörter	Federal Programs; Educational Policy; Policy Formation; State Policy; State Legislation; State Action; Federal Aid; Competition; Incentive Grants; Educational Change; Educational Practices; Change Strategies; Politics of Education; Political Influences; Academic Achievement; Federal Legislation; Educational Legislation; Arizona; Colorado; Delaware; District of Columbia; Florida; Georgia; Hawaii; Illinois; Kentucky; Louisiana; Maryland; Massachusetts; New Jersey; New York; North Carolina; Ohio; Pennsylvania; Rhode Island; Tennessee + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Politics of education; Bildungspolitik; Politische Betätigung; Landesrecht; Staatliche Intervention; Wettkampf; Finanzieller Anreiz; Bildungsreform; Bildungspraxis; Lösungsstrategie; Educational policy; Political influence; Politischer Einfluss; Schulleistung; Bundesrecht; Bildungsrecht; Schulgesetz; Master-Studiengang
Abstract	Caught between extraordinary public expectations and relatively modest constitutional authority, U.S. presidents historically have fashioned all sorts of mechanisms--executive orders, proclamations, memoranda--by which to move their objectives forward. William Howell asserts that under President Barack Obama's administration, presidential entrepreneurialism has continued unabated. Like his predecessors, Obama has sought to harness and consolidate his influence outside of Congress. He also has made contributions of his own to the arsenal of administrative policy devices. The most creative, says Howell, is perhaps his Race to the Top initiative, which attempted to spur wide-ranging reforms in education, a policy domain in which past presidents exercised very little independent authority. This study examines the effects of Obama's Race to the Top on education policymaking around the country. Its focus is the education policymaking process itself; the adoption of education policies is the outcome of interest. The overall findings indicate that Race to the Top had a meaningful impact on the production of education policy across the United States. In its aftermath, all states experienced a marked surge in the adoption of education policies. This surge does not appear to be a statistical aberration or an extension of past policy trends. Legislators from all states reported that Race to the Top affected policy deliberations within their states. The patterns of policy adoptions and legislator responses, moreover, correspond with states' experiences in the Race to the Top competitions. In the main, the evidence suggests that by strategically deploying funds to cash-strapped states and massively increasing the public profile of a controversial set of education policies, the president managed to stimulate reforms that had stalled in state legislatures, stood no chance of enactment in Congress, and could not be accomplished via unilateral action. (ERIC).
Anmerkungen	Hoover Institution. Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305-6010. Tel: 800-935-2882; Fax: 650-723-8626; e-mail: educationnext@hoover.stanford.edu; Web site: http://educationnext.org/journal/
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update	2020/1/01