Avoiding the Peril of Publishing Qualitative Scholarship in Predatory Journals

Autor/in	Beall, Jeffrey
Titel	Avoiding the Peril of Publishing Qualitative Scholarship in Predatory Journals
Quelle	In: Journal of Ethnographic & Qualitative Research, 8 (2013) 1, S.1-12 (12 Seiten) PDF als Volltext Verfügbarkeit
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
ISSN	1935-3308
Schlagwörter	Periodicals; Qualitative Research; Journal Writing; Publishing Industry; Models; Scientific Research; Plagiarism; Authors; Open Source Technology; Scholarship + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Periodical; Journal; Zeitschrift; Fachzeitschrift; Periodikum; Qualitative Forschung; Zeitschriftenaufsatz; Analogiemodell; Plagiat; Author; Autor; Autorin; Scholarships; Stipendium
Abstract	Scholarly communication is caught between the traditions of the past and the possibilities of the future. Specifically, scholarly open-access publishing is enabling greater access to research but, at the same time, is enabling an abundance of low quality publishers and an apparent increase in author misconduct. In this article I examine six questions that frame the current state of scholarly communication. The questions examine the gold open-access model, the differences in research cultures that make open access more popular in some regions than others, the demarcation between science and non-science, the Eurodominance of scholarly publishing, and the advantages to research that large science publishers make possible. (As Provided).
Anmerkungen	Cedarville University. 251 North Main Street, Cedarville, OH 45314. Tel: 937-766-3242; Fax: 937-766-7971; e-mail: jeqr@comcast.net; Web site: http://www.cedarville.edu/jeqr
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update	2020/1/01