Literaturnachweis - Detailanzeige
Autor/inn/en | Rasmussen, Palle; Zou, Yihuan |
---|---|
Titel | The Development of Educational Accountability in China and Denmark |
Quelle | In: Education Policy Analysis Archives, 22 (2014) 121, (26 Seiten)Infoseite zur Zeitschrift
PDF als Volltext |
Sprache | englisch |
Dokumenttyp | gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz |
ISSN | 1068 2341 |
Schlagwörter | Accountability; Foreign Countries; Governance; Educational Administration; Educational History; Cultural Differences; Role; Cultural Context; Educational Policy; Policy Formation; Higher Education; Elementary Secondary Education; Educational Quality; Institutional Evaluation; Administrative Organization; Educational Change; Student Evaluation; Parent Participation; Academic Achievement; Teacher Education; Comparative Education; Intellectual Disciplines; Engineering Education; Medical Education; Standards; Accreditation (Institutions); China; Denmark Verantwortung; Ausland; Education; Educational policy; Financing; Steuerung; Bildung; Erziehung; Bildungspolitik; Finanzierung; Bildungsverwaltung; Schuladministration; Schulverwaltung; History of education; Bildungsgeschichte; Kultureller Unterschied; Rollen; Politics of education; Politische Betätigung; Hochschulbildung; Hochschulsystem; Hochschulwesen; Quality of education; Bildungsqualität; Bildungsreform; Schulnote; Studentische Bewertung; Elternmitwirkung; Schulleistung; Lehrerausbildung; Lehrerbildung; Vergleichende Erziehungswissenschaft; Geisteswissenschaften; Ingenieurausbildung; Medizinische Ausbildung; Standard; Accreditation; Institution; Institutions; Akkreditierung; Staatliche Anerkennung; Institut; Dänemark |
Abstract | In recent decades, the concept of accountability has attracted more and more attention in public governance and management. The management of education is no exception. This article presents and discusses the evolution and current status of educational accountability in two different national contexts, China and Denmark. Two main sectors of education are covered, general school education and higher education. It is shown that both countries are marked by an increasing concern with educational accountability, that differences in history and culture between the two countries are reflected in the approaches to accountability, but that there are still considerable similarities in the types of accountability pursued. Under the influence of a transnational regime of policy development both countries seem to be moving towards output-based accountability, but more traditional inspection continues to have a role. (As Provided). |
Anmerkungen | Colleges of Education at Arizona State University and the University of South Florida. c/o Editor, USF EDU162, 4202 East Fowler Avenue, Tampa, FL 33620-5650. Tel: 813-974-3400; Fax: 813-974-3826; Web site: http://epaa.asu.edu |
Erfasst von | ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC |
Update | 2020/1/01 |