Literaturnachweis - Detailanzeige
Autor/inn/en | Malone, Amelia S.; Fuchs, Lynn S. |
---|---|
Titel | Comparing the Contribution of Teacher versus Tutor Ratings of Inattentive Behavior in Predicting Mathematics Achievement |
Quelle | In: Remedial and Special Education, 35 (2014) 6, S.378-386 (9 Seiten)Infoseite zur Zeitschrift
PDF als Volltext |
Zusatzinformation | Weitere Informationen |
Sprache | englisch |
Dokumenttyp | gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz |
ISSN | 0741-9325 |
DOI | 10.1177/0741932514539855 |
Schlagwörter | Student Behavior; Attention Span; Grade 4; Elementary School Students; Elementary School Teachers; At Risk Students; Learning Problems; Mathematics Instruction; Mathematical Concepts; Tutors; Behavior Problems; Rating Scales; Elementary School Mathematics; Graduate Students; Knowledge Level; Attention Deficit Disorders; Pretests Posttests; Small Group Instruction; Large Group Instruction; Predictor Variables; Computation; National Assessment of Educational Progress; Wide Range Achievement Test Student behaviour; Schülerverhalten; School year 04; 4. Schuljahr; Schuljahr 04; Elementary school; Teacher; Teachers; Grundschule; Volksschule; Lehrer; Lehrerin; Lehrende; Lernproblem; Mathematics lessons; Mathematikunterricht; Förderlehrer; Lehrender; Tutor; Rating-Skala; Elementare Mathematik; Schulmathematik; Graduate Study; Student; Students; Aufbaustudium; Graduiertenstudium; Hauptstudium; Studentin; Wissensbasis; Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder; ADHS; Aufmerksamkeits-Defizit-Hyperaktivitäts-Störung; Aufmerksamkeitsstörung; Prädiktor |
Abstract | The purpose of this study was to assess the relative contribution of teacher and tutor ratings of inattentive behavior in two different instructional settings in predicting students' performance on fraction concepts and whole-number calculations. Classroom teachers rated each student's attentive behavior in a whole-class setting and tutors rated each student's attentive behavior in an intensive small-group setting. The sample was 131 fourth-grade students identified as at risk for developing mathematics difficulties (MD) and randomly assigned to fraction tutoring. Teachers and tutors rated each student's inattentive behavior in the 10th week of the 12-week intervention period. On average, tutors rated students as more attentive than teachers. Also, tutor ratings had greater predictive power than teacher ratings on fraction concepts, but neither set of ratings uniquely predicted performance on whole-number calculations. Possible explanations for findings and directions for future research are discussed. (As Provided). |
Anmerkungen | SAGE Publications and Hammill Institute on Disabilities. 2455 Teller Road, Thousand Oaks, CA 91320. Tel: 800-818-7243; Tel: 805-499-9774; Fax: 800-583-2665; e-mail: journals@sagepub.com; Web site: http://sagepub.com |
Erfasst von | ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC |
Update | 2017/4/10 |