The Academic Profession and University Governance Participation in Japan: Focusing on the Role of Kyoju-kai

Autor/in	Yonezawa, Akiyoshi
Titel	The Academic Profession and University Governance Participation in Japan: Focusing on the Role of Kyoju-kai
Quelle	In: Educational Studies in Japan: International Yearbook, (2014) 8, S.19-31 (13 Seiten) PDF als Volltext kostenfreie Datei Verfügbarkeit
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
ISSN	1881-4832
Schlagwörter	Foreign Countries; College Faculty; Higher Education; Governance; Teacher Participation; Teacher Role; Surveys; Comparative Analysis; Decision Making; Legal Problems; Teaching (Occupation); Organizational Culture; Universities; Multiple Regression Analysis; Asia; Japan + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Ausland; Fakultät; Hochschulbildung; Hochschulsystem; Hochschulwesen; Education; Educational policy; Financing; Steuerung; Bildung; Erziehung; Bildungspolitik; Finanzierung; Lehrerrolle; Survey; Umfrage; Befragung; Decision-making; Entscheidungsfindung; Teaching; Lehrberuf; Unternehmenskultur; University; Universität; Asien
Abstract	The dominant role of Kyoju-kai (the professoriate) in university governance in Japan is now facing a critical examination as part of university reforms in response to global competition. What are the determinants of the characteristics of participation in university governance by individual faculty members? In what way does the organizational structure, such as the professoriates at Japanese universities, influence the participation patterns? This article first establishes an analytical framework for the examination of the role of the professoriate of Japanese universities, applying the arguments of McNay (1995) and Ehara (2010). Secondly, the structure of faculty participation in university governance in Japan is examined through analysis of recent survey data on the academic profession in Asia. Thirdly, through a comparative analysis this paper examines how dominance of decision making by the Kyoju-kai or the faculty committees and boards does not necessarily assure a sense of participation among faculty members. Based on the examination above, the author discusses how the legal protection of Kyoju-kai in Japanese universities does not necessarily assure collegium-type university governance, but may lead to a bureaucracy that satisfies neither institutional managers nor faculty members. Finally, the author discusses the significance of the above points in the broader context of the historical transformation of the characteristics of university governance in Japan, and argues for the necessity of further comparative studies based on a precise understanding of the historical and organizational contexts of universities and higher education systems. (As Provided).
Anmerkungen	Japanese Educational Research Association. UK's Building 3F, 2-29-3 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-0033 Japan. Tel: +81-3-3818-2505; Fax: +81-3-3816-6898; e-mail: jsse@oak.ocn.ne.jp; Web site: http://www.soc.nii.ac.jp/jsse4/index-e.html
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update	2020/1/01