Literaturnachweis - Detailanzeige
Autor/inn/en | Harik, Polina; Baldwin, Peter; Clauser, Brian |
---|---|
Titel | Comparison of Automated Scoring Methods for a Computerized Performance Assessment of Clinical Judgment |
Quelle | In: Applied Psychological Measurement, 37 (2013) 8, S.587-597 (11 Seiten)
PDF als Volltext |
Sprache | englisch |
Dokumenttyp | gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz |
ISSN | 0146-6216 |
DOI | 10.1177/0146621613493829 |
Schlagwörter | Computer Assisted Testing; Automation; Scoring; Comparative Analysis; Licensing Examinations (Professions); Performance Based Assessment; Efficiency; Validity; Reliability; Expertise; Physicians; Regression (Statistics); Correlation; United States Medical Licensing Examination |
Abstract | Growing reliance on complex constructed response items has generated considerable interest in automated scoring solutions. Many of these solutions are described in the literature; however, relatively few studies have been published that "compare" automated scoring strategies. Here, comparisons are made among five strategies for machine-scoring examinee performances of computer-based case simulations, a complex item format used to assess physicians' patient-management skills as part of the Step 3 United States Medical Licensing Examination. These strategies utilize expert judgments to obtain various (a) case-specific or (b) generic scoring algorithms. The various compromises between efficiency, validity, and reliability that characterize each scoring approach are described and compared. (As Provided). |
Anmerkungen | SAGE Publications. 2455 Teller Road, Thousand Oaks, CA 91320. Tel: 800-818-7243; Tel: 805-499-9774; Fax: 800-583-2665; e-mail: journals@sagepub.com; Web site: http://sagepub.com |
Erfasst von | ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC |
Update | 2017/4/10 |