Counterpoint Piece: The Case for Variety in Corrective Feedback Research

Autor/inn/en	Lyster, Roy; Ranta, Leila
Titel	Counterpoint Piece: The Case for Variety in Corrective Feedback Research
Quelle	In: Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 35 (2013) 1, S.167-184 (18 Seiten)Infoseite zur Zeitschrift PDF als Volltext Verfügbarkeit
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
ISSN	0272-2631
DOI	10.1017/S027226311200071X
Schlagwörter	Stellungnahme; Feedback (Response); Second Language Learning; Error Correction; Comparative Analysis; Second Language Instruction; Criticism; Research Methodology + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Zweitsprachenerwerb; Korrektur; Fremdsprachenunterricht; Kritik; Research method; Forschungsmethode
Abstract	Goo and Mackey (this issue) outline several apparent design flaws in studies that have compared the impact of different types of corrective feedback (CF). Furthermore, they argue that SLA researchers should stop comparing recasts to other types of CF because they are inherently different kinds of phenomena. Our response to their article addresses (a) the claim that the recast-learning relationship has been "settled," (b) the misleading representation of our views on uptake, (c) the characterization of the CF comparison studies as being weak and invalid, and (d) Goo and Mackey's recommendations concerning the most appropriate approach to investigating the effect of feedback on second language learning. (As Provided).
Anmerkungen	Cambridge University Press. The Edinburgh Building, Shaftesbury Road, Cambridge, CB2 8RU, UK. Tel: 800-872-7423; Tel: 845-353-7500; Tel: +44-1223-326070; Fax: 845-353-4141; Fax: +44-1223-325150; e-mail: subscriptions_newyork@cambridge.org; Web site: http://www.cambridge.org
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update	2017/4/10