Implementing a Student-Level Data Network (Part IV): Exploring Design Options

Autor/inn/en	Isaac, James; Velez, Erin; Roberson, Amanda Janice
Institution	RTI International; Institute for Higher Education Policy (IHEP)
Titel	Implementing a Student-Level Data Network (Part IV): Exploring Design Options
Quelle	(2023), (56 Seiten) PDF als Volltext kostenfreie Datei Verfügbarkeit
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Monographie
Schlagwörter	College Students; Data; Information Networks; Program Design; Program Implementation; Data Collection; Federal Programs; Higher Education; Data Use; Outcomes of Education; Student Records; Privacy; Data Analysis; Information Storage; Student Loan Programs; Information Systems; Graduation Rate; Information Security; Governance + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Collegestudent; Daten; Informationsnetz; Programme design; Programmaufbau; Programmplanung; Data capture; Datensammlung; Hochschulbildung; Hochschulsystem; Hochschulwesen; Lernleistung; Schulerfolg; Schülerakte; Privatsphäre; Auswertung; Informationsspeicherung; Education; Educational policy; Financing; Steuerung; Bildung; Erziehung; Bildungspolitik; Finanzierung
Abstract	Students, families, colleges, and lawmakers need clearer information on postsecondary outcomes to make informed decisions. By leveraging data available at institutions and federal agencies, a nationwide student-level data network (SLDN) would close information gaps that persist in our higher education landscape to answer critical questions about students' outcomes. The brief we released today shares lessons learned from a series of conversations with higher education experts aimed at developing a modernized SLDN to ensure stakeholders have the information they need to maximize our collective return on investment in higher education. "Implementing a Student-Level Data Network?(Part IV):?Exploring Design Options" examines high-level conceptual plans for the design and implementation of a federal SLDN developed by three teams of experts. By deliberately engaging experts with a range of perspectives and knowledge, RTI International and IHEP identified potential pain points and solutions related to data submission, data governance, information security, and data usage. Through the considerations presented in the designs and robust discussion at the forum, the authors examined how a well-implemented SLDN could improve data collection and count all students. The brief also highlights ways to reduce the burden on institutions and the National Center for Education Statistics. In our next steps, RTI and IHEP plan to continue to engage experts and gather intelligence, supporting the brainstorming around SLDN design in preparation for future passage of the College Transparency Act or a similar bill creating an SLDN. [For Part III, "Insights from Financial Aid Experts," see ED620389.] (As Provided).
Anmerkungen	Institute for Higher Education Policy. 1825 K Street Suite 720, Washington, DC 20006. Tel: 202-861-8223; Fax: 202-861-9307; e-mail: institute@ihep.org; Web site: http://www.ihep.org
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update	2024/1/01