Literaturnachweis - Detailanzeige
| Autor/in | Ceja, Kay Lynn |
|---|---|
| Titel | A Critical Discourse Analysis of Teacher Preparation Standards within Inclusion-Intensive States |
| Quelle | (2022), (227 Seiten)
PDF als Volltext Ph.D. Dissertation, Chapman University |
| Sprache | englisch |
| Dokumenttyp | gedruckt; online; Monographie |
| ISBN | 979-8-4387-4885-4 |
| Schlagwörter | Hochschulschrift; Dissertation; Discourse Analysis; Teacher Education Programs; Inclusion; Students with Disabilities; State Standards; General Education; Special Education; Special Schools; Best Practices; Program Implementation |
| Abstract | Federal law calls for students with disabilities to be educated in the least restrictive environment possible. However, this still allows for students with disabilities to be placed in a range of educational settings, from the general education classroom to a separate school. The number of students with disabilities that are included to the maximum extent possible in the general education classroom varies by state. This study focused on the role of teacher training as defined by state driven teacher education standards. The purposeful outlier sample was selected by identifying the 12 states with the highest levels of inclusion of students with disabilities within a general education classroom across select disability categories. The level of inclusion was based on the percentages of students with disabilities in three educational settings: 80% or more of the day in general education, less than 40% of the day in general education, and separate school across all 50 states over a ten-year period. The teacher education standards for these states were obtained and Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) was used to analyze the standards for evidence both of best practices in regards to implementing inclusion, as well as how disability was described by these states. Evidence of many of the best practices were found in these states' standards, and disability was often included in standards about teaching practices, learning environments, and diversity. However, it was also found that disability (and teaching practices) were often described in vague, non-specific terms, which may lead to the impression that disability is not included or important. These results are helpful in shaping the direction of the writing of standards in the future to better include and acknowledge disability in them. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.] (As Provided). |
| Anmerkungen | ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://www.proquest.com/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml |
| Erfasst von | ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC |
| Update | 2024/1/01 |
Literaturbeschaffung und Bestandsnachweise in Bibliotheken prüfen
Permalink als QR-Code
Inhalt auf sozialen Plattformen teilen (nur vorhanden, wenn Javascript eingeschaltet ist)
Teile diese Seite:
