Literaturnachweis - Detailanzeige
| Autor/inn/en | Viennot, Laurence; Décamp, Nicolas |
|---|---|
| Titel | Main Reasons to Call a Text into Question |
| Quelle | (2020), (15 Seiten)
PDF als Volltext |
| Sprache | englisch |
| Dokumenttyp | gedruckt; online; Monographie |
| Schlagwörter | Critical Reading; Critical Thinking; Physics; Misconceptions; Scientific Concepts; Logical Thinking; Generalization; Experiments |
| Abstract | This chapter illustrates the main warning signals that could help us to detect the flaws of an explanation in physics: internal contradiction (two examples); direct contradiction of a law of physics (one example); indirect contradiction of a law of physics (one example); logical incompleteness of an explanation (three examples); overgeneralization (three examples); incompatibility with a thought experiment (three examples); incompatibility with an unperformed experiment (one example). Finally, we point out that several warning signals can intervene in parallel to question a given text, as shown in a last example (the direction of the current in the batteries). [For the complete volume, "Developing Critical Thinking in Physics: The Apprenticeship of Critique. Contributions from Science Education Research. Volume 7," see ED615688.] (As Provided). |
| Anmerkungen | Springer. Available from: Springer Nature. One New York Plaza, Suite 4600 New York, NY 10004. Tel: 800-777-4643; Tel: 212-460-1500; Fax: 212-460-1700; e-mail:customerservice@springernature.com; Web site: https://www.springer.com/gp/education-language |
| Erfasst von | ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC |
| Update | 2024/1/01 |
Literaturbeschaffung und Bestandsnachweise in Bibliotheken prüfen
Permalink als QR-Code
Inhalt auf sozialen Plattformen teilen (nur vorhanden, wenn Javascript eingeschaltet ist)
Teile diese Seite:
