Promoting People Potential for Digital Village Development in Mahasarakham

Autor/inn/en	Arreerard, Woraphapa; Ruangsan, Niraj
Titel	Promoting People Potential for Digital Village Development in Mahasarakham
Quelle	58 (2021) 2, S.10416-10423 (8 Seiten)Infoseite zur Zeitschrift PDF als Volltext kostenfreie Datei Verfügbarkeit
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
ISSN	0033-3077
Schlagwörter	Foreign Countries; Information Technology; Technology Integration; Economic Development; Social Change; Program Effectiveness; College Students; Youth; Community Programs; Program Development; Curriculum Development; Technological Literacy; Information Literacy; Volunteers; Media Literacy; Information Security; Computer Security; Thailand + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Ausland; Informationstechnologie; Wirtschaftsentwicklung; Sozialer Wandel; Collegestudent; Jugend; Jugendlicher; Jugendalter; Programmplanung; Curriculum; Development; Curriculumentwicklung; Lehrplan; Entwicklung; Technisches Wissen; Informationskompetenz; Freiwilliger; Media skills; Medie competence; Medienkompetenz; Computervirus; Computersicherheit
Abstract	The objectives of this research were: 1) to develop a model of promoting the potential of people in the digital field towards the development of digital villages (PDG) in Mahasarakham, Thailand; 2) to develop a course of promoting PDG in Mahasarakham and the learning multimedia; 3) to promote PDG in Mahasarakham; 4) to monitor and evaluate the development of digital villages in Mahasarakham. The sample consisted of 1) 300 volunteer digital ambassadors classified into: 1.1) 65 people, 1.2) 130 youths and 105 students of the Faculty of Information Technology, Rajabhat Mahasarakham University; 2) 1,300 people from 13 communities in Mahasarakham, 100 people per community. The research results indicated that 1) the model consisted of 4 steps: 1.1) the procedure for determining the steps for promoting the potential of the people in the digital field; 1.2) curriculum development process for enhancing people's potential in digital field; 1.3) the process of promoting the potential of people in the digital field; and 1.4) the follow-up process for evaluation of digital village development. 2) A 6-hour digital public potential promotion course consisting of 9 topics; 2.1) Rights and responsibilities in the digital age; 2.2) Digital access; 2.3) Communication in the digital age; 2.4) Security in the digital age; 2.5) Media and information literacy; 2.6) Practices in a digital society; 2.7) Good health in the digital age; 2.8) digital commerce; 2.9) Digital Law. 3) The results of the potential development of people in the digital field were as follows: 3.1) 300 "Volunteer Digital Ambassadors" had 63.79% level of knowledge, understanding and skills and overall satisfaction at the highest level ([x-bar] = 4.52 and SD = 0.51) and 3.2) 1,300 people had the knowledge, understanding and skills of 64.87% and had the highest overall average satisfaction ([x-bar] = 4.51 and SD. = 0.53). 4) The results of the digital village development monitoring were as follows: 4.1) The results of the preparation of the evaluation criteria consist of 7 points as follows: 4.1.1) Community knowledge and skills from capacity development training accounted for more than 60%; 4.1.2) The number of people 60 percent or more have a Smartphone; 4.1.3) The number of people 60% or more uses LINE program at least 1 hour per day; 4.1.4) The number of people 60% or more used Facebook program at least 1 hour per day; 4.1.5) The number of people 20 percent or more used Facebook or Line program as a tool to help run their own business or community enterprise groups; 4.1.6) 20% of the population or more were using online trading programs such as LAZADA or Shopee; 4.1.7) The community had a community group line for use in constructive communication within the group; 4.2) The evaluation results of digital village development in Mahasarakham Province found that all 13 communities had the evaluation results of digital villages according to the specified criteria. (As Provided).
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update	2024/1/01