Literaturnachweis - Detailanzeige
Autor/inn/en | Nese, Joseph F. T.; Alonzo, Julie; Kamata, Akihito |
---|---|
Titel | Comparing Passage Lengths and Human vs Speech Recognition Scoring of Oral Reading Fluency Poster presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (Apr 2016). |
Quelle | (2016), (2 Seiten)
PDF als Volltext |
Zusatzinformation | Weitere Informationen |
Sprache | englisch |
Dokumenttyp | gedruckt; online; Monographie |
Schlagwörter | Text Structure; Oral Reading; Reading Fluency; Reading Tests; Computer Assisted Testing; Speech; Recognition (Psychology); Reading Rate; Scores; Error Patterns; Scoring; Audio Equipment |
Abstract | The purpose of this study was to compare traditional oral reading fluency (ORF) measures to a computerized oral reading evaluation (CORE) system that uses speech recognition software. We applied a mixed model approach with two within-subject variables to test the mean WCPM score differences and the error rates between: passage length (25, 50, 85, and 250 words), and scoring method (real-time, recorded audio, and automated speech recognition [ASR]). We also used weighted Cohen's kappa to analyze the word score agreement across scoring methods. We found that shorter passages had greater WCPM means than traditional ORF passages, and that real-time (traditional) scores had greater means than both audio recording and ASR scores; the latter two were similar across passage length and grade. (As Provided). |
Erfasst von | ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC |
Update | 2024/1/01 |