Improving Speech Intelligibility in Children with Childhood Apraxia of Speech: Employing Evidence-Based Practice. EBP Briefs. Volume 9, Issue 5

Autor/in	Koehlinger, Keegan M.
Institution	Pearson
Titel	Improving Speech Intelligibility in Children with Childhood Apraxia of Speech: Employing Evidence-Based Practice. EBP Briefs. Volume 9, Issue 5
Quelle	(2015), (12 Seiten) PDF als Volltext Verfügbarkeit
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Monographie
Schlagwörter	Speech Impairments; Speech Improvement; Evidence Based Practice; Literature Reviews; Preschool Education; Preschool Children; Psychomotor Skills; Sensory Aids; Intermode Differences; Instructional Effectiveness; Perceptual Motor Learning; Journal Articles + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Speech impairment; Speech handicap; Speech handicaps; Language handicps; Language impairments; Sprachbehinderung; Sprechentwicklung; Pre-school education; Vorschulerziehung; Pre-school age; Preschool age; Child; Children; Preschool education; Vorschulalter; Kind; Kinder; Vorschulkind; Vorschulkinder; Vorschule; Psychomotorische Aktivität; Sinnesreiz; Unterrichtserfolg; Perceptual-motor learning; Sensumotorisches Lernen; Wahrnehmungsschulung; Journal article; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
Abstract	Clinical Question: Would a preschool-aged child with childhood apraxia of speech (CAS) benefit from a singular approach--such as motor planning, sensory cueing, linguistic and rhythmic--or a combined approach in order to increase intelligibility of spoken language? Method: Systematic Review. Study Sources: ASHA Wire, Google Scholar, Speech Bite. Search Terms: childhood apraxia of speech or developmental apraxia of speech AND intervention OR treatment. Number of Studies Included: 11. Primary Results: The greatest volume of evidence was available to support use of a motor-planning approach incorporating integral stimulation and/or Dynamic Temporal and Tactile Cueing (DTTC) approach for children with CAS. Although two studies provided support for a combined approach to treatment, the evidence for motor-planning approaches was more coherent and developed. Conclusions: Jane elected to adopt a motor-planning approach to address the needs of her client, drawing specific treatment characteristics from the published literature. (As Provided).
Anmerkungen	NCS Pearson, Inc. 5601 Green Valley Drive Bloomington, MN 55437. Tel: 800-627-7271; Fax: 800-232-1223; Web site: https://www.pearsonclinical.com/language/ebp-briefs.html
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update	2020/1/01