Literaturnachweis - Detailanzeige
Autor/inn/en | Liu, Kimy; Sundstrom-Hebert, Krystal; Ketterlin-Geller, Leanne R.; Tindal, Gerald |
---|---|
Institution | University of Oregon, Behavioral Research and Teaching (BRT) |
Titel | Instrument Development Procedures for Silent Reading Measures. Technical Report Number 08-03 |
Quelle | (2008), (23 Seiten)
PDF als Volltext |
Sprache | englisch |
Dokumenttyp | gedruckt; online; Monographie |
Schlagwörter | Quantitative Daten; Silent Reading; Reading Fluency; Reading Tests; Test Validity; Public Schools; Grade 3; Grade 4; Grade 5; Grade 6; Grade 7; Grade 8; Pilot Projects; Test Items; Item Response Theory; Difficulty Level; Elementary School Students; Middle School Students Stilles Lesen; Lesetest; Testvalidität; Public school; Öffentliche Schule; School year 03; 3. Schuljahr; Schuljahr 03; School year 04; 4. Schuljahr; Schuljahr 04; School year 05; 5. Schuljahr; Schuljahr 05; School year 06; 6. Schuljahr; Schuljahr 06; School year 07; 7. Schuljahr; Schuljahr 07; School year 08; 8. Schuljahr; Schuljahr 08; Pilot project; Modellversuch; Pilotprojekt; Test content; Testaufgabe; Item-Response-Theorie; Schwierigkeitsgrad; Middle school; Middle schools; Student; Students; Mittelschule; Mittelstufenschule; Schüler; Schülerin |
Abstract | The purpose of this study was to develop and gather validity evidence for silent reading fluency passages. A number of passages were written following a traditional story grammar structure (character, setting, events) and placed on a computer for students to read silently. We describe in detail, the manner in which content-related evidence was established and then present a number of statistical analyses conducted to evaluate the technical adequacy of these measures. The outcomes support the test development process and reflect a series of measures that have potential for use in measuring elementary and middle school students' silent reading fluency. Appended are: (1) Internal Review Rating Form; (2) Directions for Administration; (3) Comparison of Word Counts: Hand-Counted versus Algorithm-Counted; (4) Mean, Minimum and Maximum Words per Minute for Each Test Item; and (5) Estimated Item Difficulty Obtained from Rasch Item Response Model. (Contains 13 tables and 1 footnote.) (As Provided). |
Anmerkungen | Behavioral Research and Teaching. 175 Lokey Education 5262 University of Oregon, Eugene, OR 97403. Tel: 541-346-3535; Fax: 541-346-5689; Web site: http://www.brtprojects.org |
Erfasst von | ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC |
Update | 2017/4/10 |