Literaturnachweis - Detailanzeige
Autor/inn/en | Venezia, Andrea; Callan, Patrick M.; Kirst, Michael W.; Usdan, Michael D. |
---|---|
Institution | Institute for Educational Leadership; National Center for Public Policy and Higher Education; Stanford Institute for Higher Education Research |
Titel | The Governance Divide: The Case Study for Georgia. National Center Report #05-5 |
Quelle | (2006), (42 Seiten)
PDF als Volltext |
Sprache | englisch |
Dokumenttyp | gedruckt; online; Monographie |
Schlagwörter | Postsecondary Education; Elementary Secondary Education; Governance; Educational Change; Politics of Education; State Legislation; Case Studies; Agency Cooperation; Scholarships; Educational Policy; Change Strategies; College Admission; Student Placement; Dual Enrollment; Leadership Responsibility; Standardized Tests; Testing Programs; Student Evaluation; Financial Support; Dropouts; High School Graduates; College Bound Students; Educational Improvement; College Preparation; Curriculum Development; Educational Finance; Accountability; Access to Education; Data Collection; Budgets; Barriers; Cooperative Planning; Educational History; Florida; Georgia; New York; Oregon Post-secondary education; Tertiäre Bildung; Education; Educational policy; Financing; Steuerung; Bildung; Erziehung; Bildungspolitik; Finanzierung; Bildungsreform; Landesrecht; Case study; Fallstudie; Case Study; Scholarship; Stipendium; Politics of education; Lösungsstrategie; Hochschulzugang; Hochschulzulassung; Zulassung; Schülerpraktikum; Doppelstudium; Standadised tests; Standardisierter Test; Schulnote; Studentische Bewertung; Finanzielle Förderung; Drop-out; Drop-outs; Dropout; Early leavers; Schulversagen; High school; High schools; Graduate; Graduates; Oberschule; Absolvent; Absolventin; Teaching improvement; Unterrichtsentwicklung; Curriculum; Development; Curriculumentwicklung; Lehrplan; Entwicklung; Bildungsfonds; Verantwortung; Access; Zugang; Bildungszugang; Data capture; Datensammlung; Finanzhaushalt; History of education; Bildungsgeschichte |
Abstract | This case study is part of a broader research project examining state policies and governance structures that span K-12 and postsecondary education. Georgia was the first state to have state and regional P-16 councils, and its regents' office in the University System of Georgia oversees a variety of projects that focus on connecting K-12 and postsecondary education. The Georgia field research was conducted in September 2003. Two central questions that this report seeks to answer are: (1) What types of governance structures and related policies enable, or create difficulties for, P-16 reforms? (2) How necessary is a P-16 governance framework in order to create and institutionalize P-16 reform? To examine these questions and issues, this report describes the history of and context for P-16 reform and governance in Georgia. It then presents a summary of major P-16 projects and policies, and an analysis of the state's major P-16 accomplishments and challenges. The report concludes with thoughts about the present and future of P-16 reform in the state. The Georgia Interview Protocol is appended. (Contains 23 endnotes.) [For "The Governance Divide: A Report on a Four-State Study on Improving College Readiness and Success. National Center Report #05-3," see ED508097. For the Florida case study, see ED508098. For the New York case study, see ED508100. For the Oregon case study, see ED508101.] (ERIC). |
Anmerkungen | National Center for Public Policy and Higher Education. 152 North Third Street Suite 705, San Jose, CA 95112. Tel: 408-271-2699; Fax: 408-271-2697; e-mail: center@highereducation.org; Web site: http://www.highereducation.org |
Erfasst von | ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC |
Update | 2017/4/10 |