Making the Most of Interim Assessment Data. Lessons from Philadelphia

Autor/inn/en	Christman, Jolley Bruce; Neild, Ruth Curran; Bulkley, Katrina; Blanc, Suzanne; Liu, Roseann; Mitchell, Cecily; Travers, Eva
Institution	Research for Action
Titel	Making the Most of Interim Assessment Data. Lessons from Philadelphia
Quelle	(2009), (90 Seiten) PDF als Volltext kostenfreie Datei Verfügbarkeit
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Monographie
Schlagwörter	Urban Schools; Core Curriculum; Intervals; Federal Legislation; Academic Achievement; Item Analysis; Data Interpretation; Instructional Leadership; Educational Testing; Educational Assessment; Correlation; Predictor Variables; Professional Development; School Districts; Educational Improvement; Pennsylvania + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Urban area; Urban areas; School; Schools; Stadtregion; Stadt; Schule; Kerncurriculum; Bundesrecht; Schulleistung; Itemanalyse; Data evaluation; Datenauswertung; Instruction; Leadership; Bildung; Erziehung; Führung; Education; assessment; Bewertungssystem; Korrelation; Prädiktor; School district; Schulbezirk; Teaching improvement; Unterrichtsentwicklung
Abstract	Under No Child Left Behind, urban school districts have increasingly turned to interim assessments, administered at regular intervals, to help gauge student progress in advance of annual state exams. These assessments have spawned growing debate among educators, assessment experts, and the testing industry: are they worth the significant investment of money and time? In Making the Most of Interim Assessment Data: Lessons from Philadelphia, Research for Action (RFA) weighs in on this issue. The School District of Philadelphia (SDP) was an early adopter of interim assessments, implementing the exams in 2003. Unlike teachers in some other regions, Philadelphia elementary and middle grades teachers rated these 'Benchmark' assessments highly. However, the study found that enthusiasm did not necessarily correlate with higher rates of student achievement. What did predict student success were three factors--instructional leadership, collective responsibility, and use of the SDP's Core Curriculum. The report underscores the value of investment in ongoing data interpretation that emphasizes teachers' learning within formal instructional communities, such as grade groups of teachers. This research was funded by the Spencer Foundation and the William Penn Foundation. Five appendices are included: (1) Phase One Qualitative Research--School Characteristics 2006-07 Data; (2) Benchmark Item Analysis Form; (3) List of Topics Covered in Interviews; (4) Technical Details on Data and Methods; and (5) Technical Detail on Scales Used in Chapter 3. (Contains 8 figures and 56 footnotes.) [The Consortium for Chicago School Research provided technical assistance for the statistical analyses.] (ERIC).
Anmerkungen	Research for Action. 3701 Chestnut Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104. Tel: 215-823-2500; Fax: 215-823-2510; e-mail: info@researchforaction.org; Web site: http://www.researchforaction.org
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update	2017/4/10