Issues in Assessing English Language Learners: English Language Proficiency Measures and Accommodation Uses. Practice Review (Part 2 of 3). CRESST Report 732

Autor/inn/en	Wolf, Mikyung Kim; Kao, Jenny; Griffin, Noelle; Herman, Joan L.; Bachman, Patina L.; Chang, Sandy M.; Farnsworth, Tim
Institution	National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing
Titel	Issues in Assessing English Language Learners: English Language Proficiency Measures and Accommodation Uses. Practice Review (Part 2 of 3). CRESST Report 732
Quelle	(2008), (96 Seiten) PDF als Volltext kostenfreie Datei Verfügbarkeit
Zusatzinformation	Weitere Informationen
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Monographie
Schlagwörter	Federal Legislation; Second Language Learning; Research and Development Centers; Guidelines; Politics of Education; Accountability; English (Second Language); Language Proficiency; Language Tests; Educational Policy; Testing Accommodations; Validity + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Bundesrecht; Zweitsprachenerwerb; Forschungszentrum; Richtlinien; Educational policy; Bildungspolitik; Verantwortung; English as second language; English; Second Language; Englisch als Zweitsprache; Language skill; Language skills; Sprachkompetenz; Language test; Sprachtest; Politics of education; Testing process; Accessibility (for disabled); Accessibility; Disabled person; Testdurchführung; Testen; Barrierefreiheit; Zugänglichkeit; Behinderter; Gültigkeit
Abstract	The No Child Left Behind (NCLB) has had a great impact on states' policies in assessing English language learner (ELL) students. The legislation requires states to develop or adopt sound assessments in order to validly measure the ELL students' English language proficiency, as well as content knowledge and skills. While states have moved rapidly to meet these requirements, they face challenges to validate their current assessment and accountability systems for ELL students, partly due to the lack of resources. Considering the significant role of an assessment in guiding decisions about organizations and individuals, it is of paramount importance to establish a valid assessment system. In light of this, we reviewed the current literature and policy regarding ELL assessment in order to inform practitioners of the key issues to consider in their validation process. Drawn from our review of literature and practice, we developed a set of guidelines and recommendations for practitioners to use as a resource to improve their ELL assessment systems. We have compiled a series of three reports. The present report is the second component of the series, providing a comprehensive picture of states' current policies related to ELL assessment. The areas reviewed include the procedures of ELL identification and redesignation, the characteristics of English language proficiency assessments, including validity information, and the use of accommodations in the assessment of content knowledge. (Contains 13 footnotes, 10 figures, and 1 table.) [The work reported in this document was supported under the National Research and Development Centers, as administered by the U.S. Department of Education's Institute of Education Sciences. For parts 1 and 3 of this report, see ED502283 and ED502273.] (As Provided).
Anmerkungen	National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing (CRESST). 300 Charles E Young Drive N, GSE&IS Building 3rd Floor, Mailbox 951522, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1522. Tel: 310-206-1532; Fax: 310-825-3883; Web site: http://www.cresst.org
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update	2017/4/10