Assessing the Validity of the Qualistar Early Learning Quality Rating and Improvement System as a Tool for Improving Child-Care Quality

Autor/inn/en	Zellman, Gail L.; Perlman, Michal; Le, Vi-Nhuan; Setodji, Claude Messan
Institution	RAND Education
Titel	Assessing the Validity of the Qualistar Early Learning Quality Rating and Improvement System as a Tool for Improving Child-Care Quality
Quelle	(2008), (404 Seiten) PDF als Volltext Verfügbarkeit
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Monographie
ISBN	978-0-8330-4495-2
Schlagwörter	Feedback (Response); Validity; Parent Participation; Accreditation (Institutions); Nonprofit Organizations; Technical Assistance; Child Care; Educational Quality; Evaluation Methods; Case Studies; Preschool Children; Comparative Analysis; Data Collection; Classroom Environment; Employment Experience; Employment Qualifications; Educational Improvement + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Gültigkeit; Elternmitwirkung; Accreditation; Institution; Institutions; Akkreditierung; Staatliche Anerkennung; Institut; Nonprofit-Organisation; Technische Hilfe; Kinderfürsorge; Kinderbetreuung; Quality of education; Bildungsqualität; Case study; Fallstudie; Case Study; Pre-school age; Preschool age; Child; Children; Pre-school education; Preschool education; Vorschulalter; Kind; Kinder; Vorschulkind; Vorschulkinder; Vorschulerziehung; Vorschule; Data capture; Datensammlung; Klassenklima; Unterrichtsklima; Occupational experience; Job experience; Work experience; Berufserfahrung; Employment qualification; Vocational qualification; Vocational qualifications; Berufliche Qualifikation; Teaching improvement; Unterrichtsentwicklung
Abstract	As a result of the generally low quality of child care in the United States and the increased emphasis on accountability in education policy, quality rating systems (QRSs) are proliferating in the child-care arena. QRSs assess child-care providers on multiple dimensions of quality and integrate these assessments into an easily understood summary rating (such as from 0 to 4 stars). These ratings are intended to help parents, funders, and other stakeholders make more informed choices about child care and to encourage providers to improve. Most QRSs are actually QRISs-- quality rating and improvement systems--since they include feedback and technical assistance to help providers improve the quality of their care. However, there has been very little empirical examination of the validity of these systems--how reliable their multiple components are, how effective they are in helping providers to improve the quality of care they provide, and how much children benefit from such improvement. This study assesses the QRIS developed by Qualistar Early Learning, a nonprofit organization based in Colorado that was one of the first organizations to create a QRIS. Zellman et al. set out to validate the Qualistar QRIS by assessing approximately 100 child-care providers and, at the outset, over 1,300 children over three waves of data collection. The study relied on two other, established measures of child-care quality on which to rate providers, as well as a number of direct child assessments. The design allowed for both cross-sectional and time-lagged analyses. The authors analyzed the five components of the Qualistar system separately, then examined how they related to each other; compared the Qualistar measures to the other measures of quality; assessed change in provider quality over time; and examined whether quality improvements as measured by the Qualistar QRIS were associated with better child outcomes. (Contains 31 tables and 2 figures). (As Provided).
Anmerkungen	RAND Corporation. P.O. Box 2138, Santa Monica, CA 90407-2138. Tel: 877-584-8642; Tel: 310-451-7002; Fax: 412-802-4981; e-mail: order@rand.org; Web site: http://www.rand.org
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update	2017/4/10