Literaturnachweis - Detailanzeige
Sonst. Personen | Finn, Chester E., Jr (Hrsg.); Ravitch, Diane (Hrsg.) |
---|---|
Institution | Thomas B. Fordham Foundation, Washington, DC. |
Titel | Beyond the Basics: Achieving a Liberal Education for All Children |
Quelle | (2007), (192 Seiten)
PDF als Volltext |
Sprache | englisch |
Dokumenttyp | gedruckt; online; Monographie |
Schlagwörter | Stellungnahme; General Education; Elementary Secondary Education; Democracy; Accountability; Liberal Arts; Access to Education; Citizenship Education; National Curriculum; Teacher Education; Teaching Methods; Higher Education; Academic Standards; Basic Skills; Mathematics Instruction; Science Instruction; Academic Achievement; Democratic Values; Faculty Development; Teacher Salaries; School Choice; Educational Innovation; Citizen Participation; Art Education; Reading Instruction; Humanism; Student Evaluation; Core Curriculum; Humanities; Time Factors (Learning); Teaching Experience; Curriculum Development; Public Schools; Charter Schools; Virtual Classrooms; Web Based Instruction; Public Policy; Excellence in Education Allgemein bildendes Schulwesen; Allgemeinbildung; Demokratie; Verantwortung; Education; Access; Bildung; Zugang; Bildungszugang; Citizenship; Politische Bildung; Politische Erziehung; Staatsbürgerliche Erziehung; Lehrerausbildung; Lehrerbildung; Teaching method; Lehrmethode; Unterrichtsmethode; Hochschulbildung; Hochschulsystem; Hochschulwesen; Basic skill; Grundfertigkeit; Mathematics lessons; Mathematikunterricht; Teaching of science; Science education; Natural sciences Lessons; Naturwissenschaftlicher Unterricht; Schulleistung; Lehrerbesoldung; Lehrervergütung; Choice of school; Schulwahl; Instructional innovation; Bildungsinnovation; 'Citizen participation; Citizens'' participation'; Bürgerbeteiligung; Arts; Art in Education; Kunst; Erziehung; Leseunterricht; Humanismus; Schulnote; Studentische Bewertung; Kerncurriculum; Geisteswissenschaften; Humanwissenschaften; Curriculum; Development; Curriculumentwicklung; Lehrplan; Entwicklung; Public school; Öffentliche Schule; Charter school; Charter-Schule; Web Based Training; Öffentliche Ordnung; Lernerfolg |
Abstract | Citing Aristotle, Franklin and Einstein as proponents of a broad, liberal-arts education, Finn and Ravitch promote the need for liberal learning as preparatory to the civic life needed for a well-functioning democracy. Drawing together the work of a number of educators, the editors have organized this volume in two sections. Part I, Liberal Learning: Its Value and Future, includes three papers that advocate both for liberal learning, and for a common curriculum. Part II, Restoring Liberal Art to the K-12 Curriculum, features eleven explorations of how to expand liberal learning by improving accountability systems, teacher training and education delivery. Maintaining that their support of liberal learning is well-documented, the editors conclude the volume by noting four opposing trends: (1) Gradual extinction of liberal learning in higher education; (2) Standards-and-Accountability movement focused on basics skills; (3) Support for math and science and the expense of the rest of the curriculum; and (4) Widening achievement gaps. Finn and Ravitch envision a future in which liberal education is so restricted as to create a less informed and less engaged populace, to the detriment of a democratic society, Recommendations to reverse this trend are appended under four headings: (1) Standards, Assessments, and Curriculum; (2) Teacher Education, Professional Development and Compensation; (3) Choice and Innovation; and (4) Public Engagement. This book begins with an Introduction: "Why Liberal Learning," by Chester E. Finn, Jr., and Diane Ravitch. It then divides into two parts and fourteen chapters. Part I: Liberal Learning: Its Value and Future, contains: (1) Pleasure, Beauty, and Wonder: The Role of the Arts in Liberal Education (Dana Gioia); (2) What Do They Know of Reading Who Only Reading Know?: Bringing Liberal Arts into the Wasteland of the "Literacy Block" (E.D. Hirsch, Jr.); and (3) W(h)ither Liberal Education?: A Modest Defense of Humanistic Schooling in theTwenty-first Century (David J. Ferrero). Part II: Restoring Liberal Arts to the K-12 Curriculum, contains: (4) Testing, Learning, and Teaching: The Effects of Test-based Accountability on Student Achievement and Instructional Time in Core Academic Subjects (Martin West); (5) Is A Default Curriculum in High School A Good Strategy For Promoting the Humanities? (Matthew Gandal, Michael Cohen, and John Kraman); (6) Time in School: Opportunity to Learn (Kate Walsh); (7) The Case for Broadening Veteran Teachers' Education in the Liberal Arts and What We Could Do About It (Sandra Stotsky); (8) Do We Need Strong Liberal Arts Curricular Materials?(Joan Baratz-Snowden); (9) Preparing Teachers to Teach the Liberal Arts (David Steiner); (10) Expanding Access to Liberal Education in Public Schools: The Promise and Perils of Charter Schools and In-District Choice (David J. Ferrero); (11) Virtual Education and the Liberal Arts (John Holdren and Bror Saxberg); (12) Instructional Time and Curricular Emphases: U.S. State Policies in Comparative Perspective (Aaron Benavot); (13) Comfortable With Big Ideas (John Backus); and (14) Excellence for Its Own Sake (Matthew Bogdanos). (Contains 18 tables and 3 figures.) (ERIC). |
Anmerkungen | Thomas B. Fordham Foundation & Institute. 1701 K Street NW Suite 1000, Washington, DC 20006. Tel: 202-223-5452; Fax: 202-223-9226; e-mail: backtalk@edexcellence.net; Web site: http://www.edexcellence.net/foundation/publication/index.cfm |
Erfasst von | ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC |
Update | 2017/4/10 |