Literaturnachweis - Detailanzeige
Autor/in | Alstete, Jeffrey W. |
---|---|
Institution | ERIC Clearinghouse on Higher Education, Washington, DC.; George Washington Univ., Washington, DC. Graduate School of Education and Human Development.; Association for the Study of Higher Education. |
Titel | Posttenure Faculty Development: Building a System for Faculty Improvement and Appreciation. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report, Volume 27, Number 4. Jossey-Bass Higher and Adult Education Series. |
Quelle | (2000), (143 Seiten)
PDF als Volltext |
Reihe | ERIC Publications |
Sprache | englisch |
Dokumenttyp | gedruckt; online; Monographie |
ISSN | 0884-0040 |
ISBN | 0-7879-5572-8 |
Schlagwörter | Academic Rank (Professional); College Faculty; Faculty College Relationship; Faculty Development; Faculty Evaluation; Higher Education; Promotion (Occupational); Teacher Evaluation; Teacher Promotion; Tenure; Tenured Faculty |
Abstract | This book examines the debate around posttenure review and suggests a model for faculty development that combines posttenure review with faculty assessment and development. The book addresses issues such as: what is faculty development; types of posttenure faculty development programs; designing development strategies; and what are the implications of choosing to develop faculty. Section titles include: (1) "Why Is Development of Tenured Faculty a Concern?" (posttenure review, need for posttenure faculty development); (2) "How Has Higher Education Responded to This Concern?" (history/roots of faculty development, models of faculty development, faculty development and posttenure review); (3) "Posttenure Faculty Development in Action" (optional posttenure programs, required posttenure faculty development, jointly sponsored programs); (4) "Designing Development Programs for Tenured Faculty" (recommendations and tools, assessment of development programs, nondeveloping tenured faculty). A concluding section suggests that posttenure faculty development should not be linked directly with the formal posttenure review process; instead, it suggests a comprehensive system of optional development opportunities, with annual development plans that combine merit pay and strong administrative leadership to ensure that improvement activities reach all tenured faculty. Appendixes include a resource section, example of a program at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln, and sample guidelines for a faculty development plan. (Contains approximately 180 references.) (CH) |
Anmerkungen | Jossey-Bass, Inc., Publishers, 350 Sansome Street, San Francisco, CA 94104-1342 ($24, plus $5.50 shipping and handling); Tel: 888-378-2537 (toll free); Fax: 800-605-2665 (toll free); Web site: http://www.josseybass.com. |
Erfasst von | ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC |