Suche

Wo soll gesucht werden?
Erweiterte Literatursuche

Ariadne Pfad:

Inhalt

Literaturnachweis - Detailanzeige

 
Autor/inDrushel, Bruce E.
TitelIf You Take the King's Shilling, You Do the King's Bidding: Funding and Censorship of Public Television Programs.
Quelle(1995), (21 Seiten)
PDF als Volltext kostenfreie Datei Verfügbarkeit 
Spracheenglisch
Dokumenttypgedruckt; online; Monographie
SchlagwörterStellungnahme; Censorship; Conservatism; Financial Support; Government Role; Higher Education; Homosexuality; Legislators; Mass Media; Moral Issues; Programming (Broadcast); Public Television
AbstractPublic broadcasting in the United States frequently draws criticism from conservatives who accuse it of pursuing an agenda promoting environmentalism, gay rights, affirmative action, reproductive choice, and other liberal causes, and of being hostile to conservative interests such as defense, the pro-life effort, and the promotion of Christian values. To date, concerns over censorship in public television have focused, not on overt efforts by Congress to determine the bounds of acceptable programs, but on not-so-subtle pressure at both the national and the local level to self-censor or risk loss of funding. Several recent cases of controversial programs have led to calls for ties between funding of the public television system and program content--programs such as "Tongues Untied,""Portrait of a Marriage," and "Tales of the City." Assessing the constitutionality of possible future efforts by Congress to place content-related conditions on the funding of public television seems to require that 3 areas of law be analyzed: (1) the current statutory framework in which the public television system operates; (2) the recent case law in the area of the First Amendment and public broadcasting; and (3) relevant overarching judicial principles. Although the Doctrine of Constitutional Conditions offers protection against congressional interference, even it may allow content of individual programs to be a factor in funding decisions--and legal scholars question the relevance of a legal principle whose genesis was in the New Deal era. (Contains 30 references.) (TB)
Erfasst vonERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Literaturbeschaffung und Bestandsnachweise in Bibliotheken prüfen
 

Standortunabhängige Dienste
Da keine ISBN zur Verfügung steht, konnte leider kein (weiterer) URL generiert werden.
Bitte rufen Sie die Eingabemaske des Karlsruher Virtuellen Katalogs (KVK) auf
Dort haben Sie die Möglichkeit, in zahlreichen Bibliothekskatalogen selbst zu recherchieren.
Tipps zum Auffinden elektronischer Volltexte im Video-Tutorial

Trefferlisten Einstellungen

Permalink als QR-Code

Permalink als QR-Code

Inhalt auf sozialen Plattformen teilen (nur vorhanden, wenn Javascript eingeschaltet ist)

Teile diese Seite: