Literaturnachweis - Detailanzeige
| Autor/in | Anderson, Stephen A. |
|---|---|
| Titel | Current Supervisory and Evaluation Practices: Paradoxes and Deficiencies. |
| Quelle | (1990), (25 Seiten)
PDF als Volltext kostenfreie Datei |
| Sprache | englisch |
| Dokumenttyp | gedruckt; online; Monographie |
| Schlagwörter | Administrator Role; Elementary Secondary Education; Evaluation Criteria; Personnel Management; Principals; Supervision; Supervisory Methods; Teacher Evaluation; Teacher Supervision; Michigan |
| Abstract | Principals' supervisory and evaluation practices are assessed in this study. Mailed questionnaires to all K-12 principals in a county within the Detroit metropolitan area yielded an overall 94 percent response rate. Principals were asked for numbers of total faculty, faculty observed, minutes of observation, types of data used to make judgments, types of observation instruments used, the purpose of observations, criteria used, types of decisions based on the data, and whether job descriptions were available. Findings indicate that supervisory deficiencies exist in job description, validity, and reliability, while at the same time principals express desire for teacher improvement. A paradox for principals is the discrepancy between accountability obligations, time, and teacher improvement. A list of guiding questions is offered for board of education members. Seven statistical tables are presented. (23 references) (LMI) |
| Erfasst von | ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC |
Literaturbeschaffung und Bestandsnachweise in Bibliotheken prüfen
Permalink als QR-Code
Inhalt auf sozialen Plattformen teilen (nur vorhanden, wenn Javascript eingeschaltet ist)
Teile diese Seite:
