Suche

Wo soll gesucht werden?
Erweiterte Literatursuche

Ariadne Pfad:

Inhalt

Literaturnachweis - Detailanzeige

 
Autor/inToews, William
InstitutionRegina Univ. (Saskatchewan). Saskatchewan Instructional Development and Research Unit.
TitelA Comparison of Three K-12 Exiting Programs: ABE, Division IV and GED. SIDRU Research Report No. 8.
Quelle(1988), (203 Seiten)Verfügbarkeit 
Spracheenglisch
Dokumenttypgedruckt; Monographie
ISBN0-7731-0141-1
SchlagwörterAdult Basic Education; Communications; Comparative Analysis; Course Content; Course Evaluation; Curriculum Evaluation; Educational Research; Elementary Secondary Education; Equivalency Tests; Foreign Countries; General Education; Graduation Requirements; High School Equivalency Programs; Mathematics Curriculum; Program Evaluation; Public School Adult Education; Science Curriculum; Social Studies; General Educational Development Tests
AbstractThe level of equivalence was compared for three kindergarten through grade 12 exit programs: (1) the Adult Basic Education (ABE) program; (2) the Division IV program through the regular high school channel; and (3) the General Educational Development (GED) tests. Comparisons were made for: time spent in course completion; objectives; emphasis of content and skill; evaluation criteria; and suggested level of cognitive functioning. The four subject areas studied were: communications; mathematics; science; and social studies. Data were obtained from curriculum descriptions, observations of the programs, and conversations with educators by seven researchers. From 1 to 10 months were required to complete a 5-10 ABE course, and time required to complete ABE 11 and 12 courses was greater than that for a Division IV course. Division IV curricula present a broader scope and emphasize skills more strongly than do ABE curricula in communications, mathematics, and science. The Division IV program emphasizes higher cognitive skills in communications, science, and social studies more than does the ABE program. The GED tests are very lacking in content for communications, mathematics, and science. Twenty tables throughout the text give classifications of the objectives in the content areas. An extensive appended table provides point-by-point comparisons of the three programs. Behavioral terms used in classifying objectives, evaluation criteria, GED test items, and GED test subject area domains are included. (SLD)
AnmerkungenSaskatchewan Instructional Development and Research Unit, University of Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada SAS 0A2.
Erfasst vonERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Literaturbeschaffung und Bestandsnachweise in Bibliotheken prüfen
 

Standortunabhängige Dienste
Die Wikipedia-ISBN-Suche verweist direkt auf eine Bezugsquelle Ihrer Wahl.
Tipps zum Auffinden elektronischer Volltexte im Video-Tutorial

Trefferlisten Einstellungen

Permalink als QR-Code

Permalink als QR-Code

Inhalt auf sozialen Plattformen teilen (nur vorhanden, wenn Javascript eingeschaltet ist)

Teile diese Seite: