Literaturnachweis - Detailanzeige
Autor/inn/en | Garrido, Mariquita; Payne, David A. |
---|---|
Titel | An Experimental Study of the Effect of Judges' Knowledge of Item Data on Two Forms of the Angoff Standard Setting Method. |
Quelle | (1987), (15 Seiten) |
Sprache | englisch |
Dokumenttyp | gedruckt; Monographie |
Schlagwörter | Academic Standards; Comparative Analysis; Criterion Referenced Tests; Cutting Scores; Difficulty Level; Higher Education; Interrater Reliability; Judges; Minimum Competency Testing; Multiple Choice Tests; Standard Setting (Scoring); Statistical Distributions; Statistics; Test Items; Test Theory Schwierigkeitsgrad; Hochschulbildung; Hochschulsystem; Hochschulwesen; Interrater-Reliabilität; Judge; Richter; Multiple choice examinations; Multiple-choice tests, Multiple-choice examinations; Multiple-Choice-Verfahren; Bewertungsskala; Wahrscheinlichkeitsverteilung; Statistik; Test content; Testaufgabe; Testtheorie |
Abstract | Minimum competency cut-off scores on a statistics exam were estimated under four conditions: the Angoff judging method with item data (n=20), and without data available (n=19); and the Modified Angoff method with (n=19), and without (n=19) item data available to judges. The Angoff method required free response percentage estimates (0-100) percent, whereas the Modified Angoff method used a seven point scale (5, 20, 40, 60, 75, 90, 95). Item data were in the form of frequency distributions of multiple-choice exam option selections for five student ability levels. Results indicated significantly: (1) greater intra-judge variability for the Angoff method; and (2) higher minimum competency cut-off scores for judges with performance data available for reference than for judges who did not have data available. Acceptable levels of inter-judge reliability, judge internal consistency, and item internal consistency were also observed. (Author) |
Erfasst von | ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC |