Literaturnachweis - Detailanzeige
Autor/in | Shaltz, Mark B. |
---|---|
Institution | Michigan Technological Univ., Houghton. Dept. of Biological Sciences. |
Titel | Development and Evaluation of the SUMIT Microcomputer Module Entitled 'Predator Functional Response'. |
Quelle | (1982), (143 Seiten)
PDF als Volltext |
Sprache | englisch |
Dokumenttyp | gedruckt; online; Monographie |
Schlagwörter | Academic Achievement; Animal Behavior; Biology; College Science; Computer Assisted Instruction; Computer Programs; Conventional Instruction; Higher Education; Instructional Materials; Lecture Method; Material Development; Microcomputers; Science Education; Science Instruction; Teaching Methods; Zoology Schulleistung; Tierverhalten; Biologie; Computer based training; Computerunterstützter Unterricht; Computer program; Computer programme; Computerprogramm; Hochschulbildung; Hochschulsystem; Hochschulwesen; Lehrmaterial; Lehrmittel; Unterrichtsmedien; Lehrmaterialentwicklung; Naturwissenschaftliche Bildung; Teaching of science; Science education; Natural sciences Lessons; Naturwissenschaftlicher Unterricht; Teaching method; Lehrmethode; Unterrichtsmethode; Zoologie |
Abstract | An experiment was conducted that compared the teaching effectiveness of a computer assisted instructional module and a lecture-discussion. The module, Predator Functional Response (PFR), was developed as part of the SUMIT (Single-concept User-adaptable Microcomputer-based Instructional Technique) project. A class of 30 students was randomly divided into two groups, one which ran the module and the other which attended a lecture on the same material. Both groups were then given a posttest, and the results analyzed using analysis of covariance and individual item analysis. No significant differences were found between the groups. The implications of these results to microcomputers and to teachers are discussed, with the conclusion that although microcomputers are effective teaching instruments, they should be incorporated into the classroom situation with care and forethought. Provided in appendices are PFR documentation, performance objectives, the posttest, the random division program used to separate the students into two groups, lecture transcript, analysis of covariance, and PFR program listings (for Apple microcomputers). (JN) |
Erfasst von | ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC |