Suche

Wo soll gesucht werden?
Erweiterte Literatursuche

Ariadne Pfad:

Inhalt

Literaturnachweis - Detailanzeige

 
Autor/inPrater, Doris L.
TitelWhat Counts as Effective University Teaching: The State of the Art.
Quelle(1983), (12 Seiten)Verfügbarkeit 
BeigabenTabellen
Spracheenglisch
Dokumenttypgedruckt; Monographie
SchlagwörterTagungsbericht; College Faculty; Evaluation Methods; Higher Education; Merit Rating; Self Evaluation (Individuals); Student Evaluation of Teacher Performance; Summative Evaluation; Teacher Effectiveness; Teacher Evaluation; Teacher Promotion; Teacher Responsibility; Tenure
AbstractThe appropriate questions in teacher evaluation in higher education are: who should evaluate, for what purposes, and using what means. Frequently, evaluation systems provide information for administrative decisions on promotion/tenure and merit. Increased reliance on student ratings of teachers has the disadvantage of distorting factors that may influence ratings, such as class size, lecture or discussion structure, and years teaching. When used as a measure of student satisfaction and supplemented with other sources, student ratings may be justified to judge some, but not all, aspects of teaching. Evaluating teacher effectiveness in terms of student achievement depends on whether the responsibility of learning rests with the pupil or the teacher. In addition to lack of agreement between faculty self-ratings and ratings by others, teachers tend to give themselves better ratings than their students do. Colleague evaluation by direct observation is best used formatively to improve teaching. Indirect review of syllabi, tests, and materials is generally useful with other evidence. The problems of defining effective teaching make evaluation particularly difficult. Evaluation will remain judgmental, but the best systems seem to use a variety of sources of evidence and explicate as clearly as possible how judgments will be made. (CM)
Erfasst vonERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update2004/1/01
Literaturbeschaffung und Bestandsnachweise in Bibliotheken prüfen
 

Standortunabhängige Dienste
Da keine ISBN zur Verfügung steht, konnte leider kein (weiterer) URL generiert werden.
Bitte rufen Sie die Eingabemaske des Karlsruher Virtuellen Katalogs (KVK) auf
Dort haben Sie die Möglichkeit, in zahlreichen Bibliothekskatalogen selbst zu recherchieren.
Tipps zum Auffinden elektronischer Volltexte im Video-Tutorial

Trefferlisten Einstellungen

Permalink als QR-Code

Permalink als QR-Code

Inhalt auf sozialen Plattformen teilen (nur vorhanden, wenn Javascript eingeschaltet ist)

Teile diese Seite: