Aesthetic Education Program: Initial Survey of Selected Implementation Sites. 1971-1972.

Autor/in	Kunkel, J. Riley
Institution	CEMREL, Inc., St. Louis, MO.
Titel	Aesthetic Education Program: Initial Survey of Selected Implementation Sites. 1971-1972.
Quelle	(1972), (97 Seiten)Verfügbarkeit
Beigaben	Tabellen
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; Monographie
Schlagwörter	Aesthetic Education; Affective Objectives; Art Education; Cognitive Objectives; Data Analysis; Educational Assessment; Educational Objectives; Elementary Secondary Education; Pilot Projects; Questionnaires; Student Attitudes; Student Characteristics; Summative Evaluation; Surveys; Tables (Data); Teacher Attitudes; Teacher Characteristics + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Ästhetische Bildung; Arts; Education; Art in Education; Kunst; Bildung; Erziehung; Kognitives Lernziel; Auswertung; assessment; Bewertungssystem; Educational objective; Bildungsziel; Erziehungsziel; Pilot project; Modellversuch; Pilotprojekt; Fragebogen; Schülerverhalten; Survey; Umfrage; Befragung; Tabelle; Lehrerverhalten
Abstract	The document presents a report from a survey to evaluate aesthetic consciousness among participants in an aesthetic education pilot project (AEP). The AEP consisted of curriculum packages entitled "Meter,""Sound and Movement,""Word Pictures,""Characterization," and "Dramatic Plot." Extended pilot trials of the aesthetic education packages were conducted during the 1971-72 school year in 18 states, Puerto Rico, and Canada. Although all students and teachers who participated in the project were sent questionnaires, the response was only 10% of the total (88 teachers and 24 student groups). Questions dealt with package content; attitudes, interests, and aesthetic background of participants; time spent on the pilot project; ease of working with the material; and increased knowledge and/or understanding of aesthetic subjects as a result of participating in the program. Survey results were analyzed by determining percentages of teachers and students who responded in various ways to the questions. Findings indicated that teachers showed approval of package materials and instrumentation as a whole. Students indicated that they had enjoyed working on all packages except "Meter," would welcome similar packages, and had learned at least a fair amount. Additional research is suggested using a larger data base. The appendix presents copies of the teacher and student questionnaires, tabular representation of responses, and directions for administration of the questionnaires. (DB)
Anmerkungen	Jennie Scaggs, Publications Department, Central Midwestern Regional Educational Laboratory, 3120 59th Street, St. Louis, Missouri 63139 ($2.75, prepayment required)
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update	2004/1/01