[Decision of the Massachusetts Labor Relations Commission in the Matter of Boston School Committee and Boston Teachers Union, Local 66, American Federation of Teachers, AFL-CIO; Boston Association of School Administrators and Supervisors; and Boston Public School Buildings Custodians Association. Case Nos. MUP-2503, MUP-2528, and MUP-2541.]

Institution	Massachusetts State Labor Relations Commission, Boston.
Titel	[Decision of the Massachusetts Labor Relations Commission in the Matter of Boston School Committee and Boston Teachers Union, Local 66, American Federation of Teachers, AFL-CIO; Boston Association of School Administrators and Supervisors; and Boston Public School Buildings Custodians Association. Case Nos. MUP-2503, MUP-2528, and MUP-2541.]
Quelle	(1977), (19 Seiten) PDF als Volltext kostenfreie Datei Verfügbarkeit
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Monographie
Schlagwörter	Recht; Collective Bargaining; Court Litigation; Elementary Secondary Education; Employment Practices; Employment Qualifications; Government Employees; Labor Problems; Labor Relations; Residence Requirements; School Personnel + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Tarifverhandlung; Rechtsstreit; Berufspraxis; Employment qualification; Vocational qualification; Vocational qualifications; Berufliche Qualifikation; Berufsproblem; Arbeitsbeziehung; Wohnungsrecht; Schulpersonal
Abstract	In May 1976, the Boston School Committee ordered "that all persons hired or promoted by the School Department" after July 1, 1976 must become residents of Boston "within three months of such hiring or promotion. . . ." Failure to comply was deemed "a voluntary termination of employment," except that promoted employees could "return to their former position." In response to complaints filed by the Boston Teachers' Union, the Boston Association of School Administrators, and the Boston Custodians' Association, the Massachusetts Labor Relations Commission ruled that although "residency as a condition of continued employment is a mandatory subject of bargaining . . . residency purely as a condition of hire is not such a mandatory subject." Furthermore, the commission ruled that"residency as a condition of promotion from one job to another" either within the same bargaining unit or in different bargaining units, "is a mandatory subject of bargaining" unless the promotional position "is 'managerial' or 'confidential' within the meaning of the law. . . ." (Author/JG)
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC