Empowering Citizen Deliberation in Direct Democratic Elections: A Field Study of the 2012 Oregon Citizens' Initiative Review.

Inhalt

Literaturnachweis - Detailanzeige

Trefferliste

Autor/Urheber	Katherine R. Knobloch; John Gastil; Traci Feller; Robert C. Richards; Robert C. Jr
Institution	Institut Veolia Environnement
Titel	Empowering Citizen Deliberation in Direct Democratic Elections: A Field Study of the 2012 Oregon Citizens' Initiative Review.
Quelle	In: 1867-139X; 1867-8521; Field Actions Science Reports (2014)(2014) PDF als Volltext kostenfreie Datei
Sprache	englisch; französisch
Dokumenttyp	online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
Schlagwörter	Civic education; Civic engagement; Deliberative democracy; Initiative; Political knowledge; Social Sciences; H
Abstract	Initiatives and referenda permit citizens to vote directly on legislation, but voters often lack essential policy information when deciding whether to support the measures on their ballots. Since citizens often do not trust policy experts and political elites to provide trustworthy information, the State of Oregon (USA) created an institution to address that problem. After an initial test in 2010, Oregon's governor signed into law the Citizens' Initiative Review Commission, which convened two stratified random samples of twenty-four Oregon voters. The first panel spent a week examining a tax reform measure, and the second reviewed a measure that would establish private casinos. At the end of their deliberations, each panel produced a one-page Citizens' Statement that was included in a Voters' Pamphlet, which the Secretary of State mailed to every registered Oregon voter. Using direct observation, panelist interviews, and large-sample, statewide surveys, researchers studied the deliberative quality and statewide impact of this unique process. They discovered that the panels met a high standard for deliberation, both from the researchers' perspective as observers and from the point of view of the participants themselves. A majority of Oregon voters became aware of the process, which produced relevant and factually accurate statements. Roughly two-thirds of those who read the statements found them to be helpful when deciding how to vote. Finally, an online survey experiment shows that reading the statements increased voter knowledge substantially. Thus, the Citizens' Initiative Review appears to provide a viable model for using citizen-centered deliberation to inform the judgments of the voting public.
Erfasst von	BASE - Bielefeld Academic Search Engine