The knowledge filter and economic growth. The role of scientist entrepreneurship.

Autor/inn/en	Audretsch, David B.; Aldridge, Taylor; Oettl, Alexander
Institution	Max-Planck-Institut für Ökonomik (Jena). Abteilung Entrepreneurship, Growth and Public Policy
Titel	The knowledge filter and economic growth. The role of scientist entrepreneurship. Gefälligkeitsübersetzung: Wissensfilter und Wirtschaftswachstum. Die Rolle von wissenschaftlichem Unternehmertum.
Quelle	Jena (2006), 66 S. PDF als Volltext kostenfreie Datei Link als defekt meldenVerfügbarkeit
Reihe	Discussion Papers on Entrepreneurship, Growth and Public Policy. 11-2006
Beigaben	Tabellen 10; grafische Darstellungen 6
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	online; Monographie; Graue Literatur
ISSN	1613-8333
DOI	10.2139/ssrn.1456458
Schlagwörter	Forschung; Forschung und Entwicklung; Technologie; Technologietransfer; Humankapital; Kleine und mittlere Unternehmen; Patent; Vermarktung; Hochschulforschung; Wissenschaft; Hochschule
Abstract	"This paper examines the prevalence and determinants of the commercialization of research by university scientists funded by grants from the National Cancer Institute (NCI). Because the two publicly available modes of scientist commercialization - patents and Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) grants - do not cover the full spectrum of commercializing activities undertaken by university scientists, the study also includes two additional measures obtained from detailed scientist interviews: licensing of intellectual property and starting a new firm. These measures are used to assess both the prevalence and determinants of scientist commercialization of research. In particular, the empirical findings suggest seven important insights: 1) Scientists receiving funding from the National Cancer Institute exhibit a robust propensity to commercialize their research. 2) Scientist entrepreneurship is the sleeping giant of commercializing university research. More than one in four patenting NCI scientists have started a new firm. 3) Two paths for commercialization of scientist research are identified - the TTO route and the entrepreneurial route. 4) Social capital enhances the propensity for scientists to commercialize their research. The impact of social capital is particularly high for the commercialization mode of scientist entrepreneurship. 5) Technology Transfer Offices are found to be helpful for the mode of commercialization involving licenses. There is less evidence suggesting that they promote scientist entrepreneurship. 6) For scientists who perceive that they are helped by their Technology Transfer Office, licensing is not only the most prevalent mode of commercialization, but it also is a substitute for entrepreneurship. 7) Scientists choosing the entrepreneurial route to commercialize their research, by not assigning patents to their university to commercialize research, tend to rely on the commercialization mode of entrepreneurship. By contrast, scientists who select the TTO route by assigning their patents to the university tend to rely on the commercialization mode of licensing." (author's abstract).
Erfasst von	GESIS - Leibniz-Institut für Sozialwissenschaften, Mannheim
Update	2007/1