Kinesiology, physical activity, physical education, and sports through an equity/equality, diversity, and inclusion (EDI) lens. A scoping review.

Autor/inn/en	Arora, Khushi; Wolbring, Gregor
Titel	Kinesiology, physical activity, physical education, and sports through an equity/equality, diversity, and inclusion (EDI) lens. A scoping review. Gefälligkeitsübersetzung: Kinesiologie, körperliche Aktivität, Sportunterricht und Sport aus der Sicht von Gleichheit/Gleichberechtigung, Diversität und Inklusion. Ein Scoping Review.
Quelle	In: Sports, 10 (2022) 4, [25 S.] PDF als Volltext kostenfreie Datei Link als defekt meldenVerfügbarkeit
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
ISSN	2075-4663
DOI	10.3390/sports10040055
Schlagwörter	Empirische Forschung; Gleichberechtigung; Diskriminierung; Gleichberechtigung; Sportsoziologie; Bewegungslehre; Sportunterricht; Sportpolitik; Empirische Forschung; Vielfalt; Inklusion; Diskriminierung; Bewegungsaktivität; Bewegungslehre; Sportaktivität; Sportpolitik; Sportsoziologie; Sportunterricht; Literaturübersicht; Vielfalt
Abstract	Background: Equity, equality, diversity, and inclusion are terms covered in the academic literature focusing on sports, kinesiology, physical education, and physical activity, including in conjunction with marginalized groups. Universities in many countries use various EDI policy frameworks and work under the EDI headers "equality, diversity and inclusion", "equity, diversity and inclusion", "diversity, equity and inclusion", and similar phrases (all referred to as EDI) to rectify problems students, non-academic staff, and academic staff from marginalized groups, such as women, Indigenous peoples, visible/racialized minorities, disabled people, and Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Queer or Questioning, and Two-Spirit (LGBTQ2S+) experience. Which EDI data, if any, are generated influences EDI efforts in universities (research, education, and general workplace climate) of all programs. Method: Our study used a scoping review approach and employed SCOPUS and the 70 databases of EBSCO-Host, which includes SportDiscus, as sources aimed to analyze the extent (and how) the academic literature focusing on sports, kinesiology, physical education, and physical activity engages with EDI. Results: We found only 18 relevant sources and a low to no coverage of marginalized groups linked to EDI, namely racialized minorities (12), women (6), LGBTQ2S+ (5), disabled people (2), and Indigenous peoples (0). Conclusions: Our findings suggest a gap in the academic inquiry and huge opportunities. (Autor).
Erfasst von	Bundesinstitut für Sportwissenschaft, Bonn
Update	2023/1