OECD reviews of school resources. Czech Republic 2016.

Autor/inn/en	Shewbridge, Claire; Herczynski, Jan; Radinger, Thomas; Sonnemann, Julie
Institution	OECD
Titel	OECD reviews of school resources. Czech Republic 2016.
Quelle	Paris: OECD (2016), 204 S. PDF als Volltext Link als defekt meldenVerfügbarkeit
Beigaben	Illustrationen
Zusatzinformation	Inhaltsverzeichnis
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	online; gedruckt; Monographie
ISBN	978-92-64-26236-2; 978-92-64-26237-9; 978-92-64-26238-6
DOI	10.1787/9789264262379-en
Schlagwörter	Chancengleichheit; Bildungspolitik; Schule; Schulsystem; Schulleitung; Schülerzahl; Lehrer; Lehrer-Schüler-Relation; Schüler; Schulbildung; Steuerung; Sozioökonomische Lage; Einkommen; Finanzierung; Bildungsindikator; Statistik; Ausstattung; Tschechische Republik
Abstract	There are entrenched inequities in the Czech school system. In international comparison, the average socio-economic background of students at a school is very strongly associated with the school's average performance and educational mobility rates are the lowest in the OECD. Notably, there is significant economic variation among the fourteen Czech regions, with varying challenges in terms of internal migration and unemployment. However, the national funding mechanism to allocate funding for "direct costs" (including staff salaries) does not include weightings to address such inequities; simply, it allocates funding on a per student basis with a different set amount for five different age bands (the national "normatives"). The Czech regions are then responsible for allocating this funding to pre-schools and basic schools (managed by municipal authorities) and to the schools they manage directly (mainly providing upper secondary education). Czech regions prepare regional development plans, however, regional funding mechanisms are rigid and overly complicated and impair the matching of funding to strategic priorities. At the same time, the majority of Czech regions have faced efficiency challenges in their school networks, with a large decline in the school-aged population. There is evidence of reorganisation and consolidation in the school networks, which has been supported by, among other factors, the per student funding allocation mechanism. However, the need to further consolidate remains a strategic challenge in several regions and notably for schools offering lower and upper secondary education. (DIPF/Orig.).
Erfasst von	DIPF \| Leibniz-Institut für Bildungsforschung und Bildungsinformation, Frankfurt am Main
Update	2017/2