Predictors of doping intentions, susceptibility, and behaviour of elite athletes: a meta-analytic review.

Autor/inn/en	Blank, Cornelia; Kopp, Martin; Niedermeier, Martin; Schnitzer, Martin; Schobersberger, Wolfgang
Titel	Predictors of doping intentions, susceptibility, and behaviour of elite athletes: a meta-analytic review. Gefälligkeitsübersetzung: Prädiktoren von Doping-Intentionen, Anfälligkeit und Verhalten von Spitzensportlern: ein meta-analytischer Überblick.
Quelle	In: SpringerPlus, 5 (2016) Art. 1333, [14] S. PDF als Volltext kostenfreie Datei Link als defekt meldenVerfügbarkeit
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
ISSN	2193-1801
DOI	10.1186/s40064-016-3000-0
Schlagwörter	Pädagogik; Evaluation; Metaanalyse; Projekt; Doping; Forschungsstand; Bekämpfung; Intervention; Literaturübersicht; Prävention; Jugendlicher
Abstract	Research in doping has focused on potential intervention strategies, increasingly targeting predicting factors. Yet, findings are inconsistent, mostly athlete-centred and explain only limited variances in behaviour. This critical review aims to (a) summarize studies that identified predictors of doping intentions, susceptibility, and behaviour in elite athletes and to (b) analyse in how far previous research included aspects beyond athlete-centred approaches, such as context and sporting culture. We reviewed 14 studies that focused on elite athletes. Situational temptation, attitudes, and subjective norms seem to be strong predicting variables of doping intentions (r )= 0.50), but intention was no predictor for behaviour. Attitudes were a significant predictor for both, doping susceptibility (r = 0.47) and behaviour (r = 0.30). Most of the predictors are athlete-centred and ignore macro-level factors that might help to explain how certain individual traits impact on the decision making process. The findings from this review call for a critical discussion of whether current doping-prevention research needs to take new directions. We propose future research to bridge findings of psychologists and sociologists, as it appears that doping behaviour cannot be explained by ignoring the one or the other. Impacts of sporting culture that have been identified in qualitative approaches need to be integrated in future quantitative approaches to test for its external validity. Inclusion of both, micro- and macro level factors may enable an integrative prevention program that creates a sporting culture without doping. (Autor).
Erfasst von	Bundesinstitut für Sportwissenschaft, Bonn
Update	2017/3