Multistakeholder perspectives on the transition to a graduate-level athletic training educational model.

Autor/inn/en	Mazerolle, Stephanie M.; Bowman, Thomas G.; Pitney, William A.
Titel	Multistakeholder perspectives on the transition to a graduate-level athletic training educational model. Gefälligkeitsübersetzung: Multumodale Perspektiven auf den Übergang zu einem abgestuften Erziehungsmodell für Sportler.
Quelle	In: Journal of athletic training, 50 (2015) 9, S. 964-976 PDF als Volltext kostenfreie Datei Link als defekt meldenVerfügbarkeit
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	online; gedruckt; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
ISSN	0160-8320; 1062-6050; 1938-162X
Schlagwörter	Erziehung; Erziehungswissenschaft; Fragebogen; Vergleichsuntersuchung; Bewegungserziehung; Leistungssport; Sportsoziologie; Soziologie; Sportwissenschaft; Analyse
Abstract	Context: The decision has been made to move away from the traditional bachelor's degree professional program to a master's degree professional program. Little is known about the perceptions about this transition from those involved with education. Objective: To examine multiple stakeholders' perspectives within athletic training education on the effect that a change to graduate-level education could have on the profession and the educational and professional development of the athletic trainer. Design: Qualitative study. Setting: Web-based survey. Patients or Other Participants: A total of 18 athletic training students (6 men, 12 women; age = 24 ± 5 years), 17 athletic training faculty (6 men, 9 women, 2 unspecified; 7 program directors, 5 faculty members, 3 clinical coordinators, 2 unidentified; age = 45 ± 8 years), and 15 preceptors (7 men, 7 women, 1 unspecified; age = 34 ± 7 years) completed the study. Data Collection and Analysis: Participants completed a structured Web-based questionnaire. Each cohort responded to questions matching their roles within an athletic training program. Data were analyzed following a general inductive process. Member checks, multiple-analyst triangulation, and peer review established credibility. Results: Thirty-one (62%) participants supported the transition, 14 (28%) were opposed, and 5 (10%) were neutral or undecided. Advantages of and support for transitioning and disadvantages of and against transitioning emerged. The first higher-order theme, advantages, revealed 4 benefits: (1) alignment of athletic training with other health care professions, (2) advanced coursework and curriculum delivery, (3) improved student and professional retention, and (4) student maturity. The second higher-order theme, disadvantages, was defined by 3 factors: (1) limited time for autonomous practice, (2) financial concerns, and (3) lack of evidence for the transition.Conclusions: Athletic training students, faculty, and preceptors demonstrated moderate support for a transition to the graduate-level model. Factors supporting the move were comparable with those detailed in a recent document on professional education in athletic training presented to the National Athletic Trainers' Association Board of Directors. The concerns about and reasons against a move have been discussed by those in the profession. Verf.-Referat.
Erfasst von	Bundesinstitut für Sportwissenschaft, Bonn
Update	2016/2