The scope of and distinction between article 126 and 127 of the Treaty on European Union and the implementation of the subsidiarity principle.

Autor/in	Groof, Jan De
Titel	The scope of and distinction between article 126 and 127 of the Treaty on European Union and the implementation of the subsidiarity principle.
Quelle	Aus: Subsidiarity and education. Leuven: Uitgeverij Acco (1994) S. 77-114Verfügbarkeit
Beigaben	Literaturangaben 117
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; Sammelwerksbeitrag
Schlagwörter	Allgemeinbildung; Bildungspolitik; Bildungsrecht; Subsidiarität; LINGUA (Förderung der Fremdsprachenkenntnisse in der EU); EU-Vertrag; Grünbuch; Mobilität; Berufsausbildung; Qualität; COMENIUS (Schüleraustauschprogramm); ERASMUS (Förderung der Mobilität von Hochschulstudenten); LEONARDO (Förderung kohärenter Entwicklung beruflicher Bildung); SOCRATES (Förderung der Schul- und Hochschulbildung)
Abstract	One of the first tasks in this publication is to achieve a coherent definition of what "education" and "vocational training" are understood to mean (I) in the light of the educational powers conferred upon European Union (II) and the exercise of these powers in the light of the subsidiarity principle (IV). A brief description is given of one or two features of the actual powers the European Union has gained (III). In what follows, an attempt will be made to argue that not only the mobility principle but also the search for quality in education and vocational training, together with the promotion of the European dimension in education, has now become an instrument for enabling the European Union to exercise its power. What is more, this instrument is likely to make a more extensive and thoroughgoing impact than the sceptics ever suspected. (DIPF/text taken from the original).
Erfasst von	DIPF \| Leibniz-Institut für Bildungsforschung und Bildungsinformation, Frankfurt am Main
Update	1998_(CD)