Comprehensive School Physical Activity Program Policies and Practices Questionnaire (CSPAP-Q).

Autor/inn/en	Stoepker, Peter; Dauenhauer, Brian; Carson, Russell L.; Moore, Justin B.
Titel	Comprehensive School Physical Activity Program Policies and Practices Questionnaire (CSPAP-Q). Gefälligkeitsübersetzung: Fragebogen zu Richtlinien und Praktiken für ein umfassendes Schulsportprogramm (CSPAP-Q).
Quelle	In: Research quarterly for exercise and sport, 92 (2021) 1, S. 100-110 PDF als Volltext Link als defekt meldenVerfügbarkeit
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	online; gedruckt; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
ISSN	0270-1367; 2168-3824
DOI	10.1080/02701367.2019.1711008
Schlagwörter	Empirische Untersuchung; Forschung; Fragebogen; Reliabilität; Validität; Forschung; Gesundheit; Kind; Validität; Schulsport; Fragebogen; Sportpädagogik; Bewegungsverhalten; Reliabilität; Gesundheitsförderung; Kind; Gesundheit; Gesundheitsförderung; Messverfahren; Bewegungsaktivität; Bewegungsverhalten; Schulsport; Sportaktivität; Sportpädagogik; Jugendlicher
Abstract	Purpose: The Comprehensive School Physical Activity Program (CSPAP) model has recently been adopted as a national framework for physical activity (PA) promotion in schools. As a result, there is a need to develop an instrument to help leaders of PA measure policies and practices across the five component areas of a CSPAP. To address this gap, our team systematically developed and assessed the psychometric properties of the CSPAP-Q, an instrument designed to assess school policies and practices related to the five components of CSPAP. Methods: The instrument development process began by reviewing existing school health and PA surveys. The Delphi method was then used to evaluate face and content validity through expert feedback. Thirty-eight physical education teachers completed the CSPAP-Q twice over a 14-day period to further establish validity and to assess test-retest reliability. Results: In total, 117 items were identified for the initial review. Upon completion of expert feedback, 22 items were eliminated and 66 items were revised. After reliability testing, three additional items were eliminated due to low test-retest agreement levels (Kappa (.40; non-significant x2). Ninety-two items were retained in the final version of the CSPAP-Q and kappa values indicated moderate to substantial agreement among items. Conclusions: After validity and reliability testing, results suggest that the CSPAP-Q is a valid and reliable tool for assessing policies and practices related to CSPAP. (Autor).
Erfasst von	Bundesinstitut für Sportwissenschaft, Bonn
Update	2022/3