Spaces of possibilities. A theoretical analysis of mentoring from a regulatory perspective.

Autor/inn/en	Ziegler, Albert; Gryc, Katharina L.; Hopp, Manuel D. S.; Stöger, Heidrun
Titel	Spaces of possibilities. A theoretical analysis of mentoring from a regulatory perspective.
Quelle	In: Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, (2021) 1483, S. 174-198 PDF als Volltext kostenfreie Datei Link als defekt meldenVerfügbarkeit
Beigaben	Literaturangaben
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	online; gedruckt; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
ISSN	0077-8923; 1749-6632
DOI	10.1111/nyas.14419
Schlagwörter	Beratung; Modell; Studium; Karriere; Karriereplanung; Betreuung; Beratung; Mentoring; Literaturanalyse; Trainingskonzept; Karriere; Karriereplanung; Studium; Betreuung; Modell; Trainingsgestaltung; Wirksamkeit; Mentoring
Abstract	A review of the literature on the effectiveness of mentoring reveals a paradox: on the one hand, there is evidence that mentoring can be highly effective. On the other hand, meta-analyses usually only show small to moderate effect sizes, and sometimes even negative effects. To better understand this mentoring paradox, we discuss three fundamental problems in mentoring research. [The authors] propose working definitions and theoretical premises to overcome these problems. [The authors] apply various systemic concepts to the field of mentoring that might help to resolve the mentoring paradox. [The authors] introduce mentees' actiotopes and their interaction with other systems as the unit of analysis, and the regulations for which mentors are responsible for in the context of mentoring as the categories of analysis. To systemize and elaborate on the regulatory dimensions of mentoring, [the authors] introduce the nonagonal framework of regulation in mentoring (NFR-M). To facilitate the analysis of ongoing changes caused by mentoring and therefore a dynamic understanding of mentoring, [the authors] introduce the concept of spaces of possibilities in mentoring (M-spaces). Finally, [the authors] introduce the concepts of the Athena Mentor to explain why mentors can differ so dramatically in the effectiveness of the regulations they are responsible for in the context of mentoring. [The authors] conclude by describing how mentoring comparisons based on the NFR-M, mentors' regulatory insight, regulatory power, and M-spaces can help to resolve the mentoring paradox. (Orig.).
Erfasst von	Externer Selbsteintrag
Update	2021/3