An Examination of Twenty Literacy, Science, and Mathematics Practices Used to Educate Students Who Are Deaf or Hard of Hearing

Autor/inn/en	Easterbrooks, Susan R.; Stephenson, Brenda
Titel	An Examination of Twenty Literacy, Science, and Mathematics Practices Used to Educate Students Who Are Deaf or Hard of Hearing
Quelle	In: American Annals of the Deaf, 151 (2006) 4, S.385-397 (13 Seiten)Infoseite zur Zeitschrift PDF als Volltext Verfügbarkeit
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
ISSN	0002-726X
Schlagwörter	Partial Hearing; Mathematics Instruction; Internet; Deafness; Literacy; Web Sites; Phonics; Reading Skills; Phonemes; Reading Ability; Reading Strategies; Language Experience Approach; Content Area Reading; College Students; Middle School Students; Comparative Analysis; Children; Adolescents; Bilingual Students; Science Instruction + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Hörbehinderung; Mathematics lessons; Mathematikunterricht; Gehörlosigkeit; Taubstummheit; Alphabetisierung; Schreib- und Lesefähigkeit; Web-Design; Reading skill; Lesefertigkeit; Fonem; Reading competence; Lesekompetenz; Reading strategy; Leselernstufe; Lesetechnik; Language; Languages; Experience; Sprache; Erfahrung; Sinnerfassendes Lesen; Collegestudent; Middle school; Middle schools; Student; Students; Mittelschule; Mittelstufenschule; Schüler; Schülerin; Child; Kind; Kinder; Adolescent; Adolescence; Adoleszenz; Jugend; Jugendalter; Jugendlicher; Teaching of science; Science education; Natural sciences Lessons; Naturwissenschaftlicher Unterricht
Abstract	The results of a multistep process to begin identifying best practices in deaf education are presented. To identify current practices, a survey was conducted of the literature, the Web sites of professional organizations, and states' education Web sites, which yielded a number of commonly discussed practices. Ten of the more highly cited practices in literacy instruction and 10 of the more highly cited practices in science and mathematics instruction were identified for additional scrutiny. Hundreds of articles were examined to identify research support for the 20 identified practices. Some practices had adequate research support; others had minimal support. The authors identify each of the 20 practices, describe the practice, present a summary of the literature that was examined, and rate the usefulness of the knowledge base relative to a "best practice" designation. (Author).
Anmerkungen	Gallaudet University Press. 800 Florida Avenue NE, Denison House, Washington, DC 20002-3695. Tel: 202-651-5488; Fax: 202-651-5489; Web site: http://gupress.gallaudet.edu/annals/
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update	2017/4/10