Literaturnachweis - Detailanzeige
Autor/inn/en | Sripai, Sunan; Wanawan, Ketkanok |
---|---|
Titel | Latent Profile Analysis of the Good Teacher Characteristics in the 21st Century in the Northeastern Region of Thailand |
Quelle | In: Educational Research and Reviews, 13 (2018) 4, S.136-143 (8 Seiten)
PDF als Volltext |
Sprache | englisch |
Dokumenttyp | gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz |
ISSN | 1990-3839 |
Schlagwörter | Profiles; Teacher Characteristics; Classification; Interviews; Teacher Attitudes; Expertise; Awards; Elementary School Teachers; Sampling; Factor Analysis; Questionnaires; Reliability; Probability; Role Models; Foreign Countries; Statistical Analysis; Thailand Charakterisierung; Profilanalyse; Classification system; Klassifikation; Klassifikationssystem; Interviewing; Interviewtechnik; Lehrerverhalten; Expert appraisal; Award; Auszeichnung; Elementary school; Teacher; Teachers; Grundschule; Volksschule; Lehrer; Lehrerin; Lehrende; Faktorenanalyse; Fragebogen; Reliabilität; Wahrscheinlichkeitsrechnung; Wahrscheinlichkeitstheorie; Identifikationsfigur; Ausland; Statistische Analyse |
Abstract | This research aimed to analyze the Latent Group Profile, hereafter (LPA) of good teacher characteristics' in the 21st century in the Northeastern region of Thailand. The samples were 4 groups, viz; 10 expert teachers for interviewing on the draft of the variable to develop the indicators; 12 teachers who won Guru Awards from Teachers Council for in-depth interviewing and use the data to adjust the variable to confirm good teacher characteristics' in the 21st century in a real situation. 1,103 primary school teachers in the Northeastern region were random from 11 provinces and were selected by applying multi-stage sampling technique and employed them for second-order confirmatory factor analysis. The research instrument was a set of 71 items questionnaire focusing on the good teacher characteristics' in the 21st century. The reliability of the questionnaire was at 0.933 and the discrepancy was between 0.264-0.696. The research findings revealed that, the LPA had 3 models, and the numbers of the groups in each model were 2, 3 and 4, respectively. When considering the probability that the classification was the most accurate (E_k), it was the model with 2 groups (likelihood = -7138.381, AIC = 14344.763, BIC = 14514.960, ABIC = 14406.967, E_k = 0.954). The proportion of the teachers in the LPA group 1 were 483 teachers, who were being a good role model for the learners (43.79%) and the LPA group 2 were 620 teachers, who believed in good values (56.21%). (As Provided). |
Anmerkungen | Academic Journals. e-mail: err@academic.journals.org; e-mail: service@academicjournals.org; Web site: http://academicjournals.org/journal/ERR |
Erfasst von | ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC |
Update | 2020/1/01 |