Whole Report versus Partial Report in RSVP Sentences

Autor/inn/en	Potter, Mary C.; Nieuwenstein, Mark; Strohminger, Nina
Titel	Whole Report versus Partial Report in RSVP Sentences
Quelle	In: Journal of Memory and Language, 58 (2008) 4, S.907-915 (9 Seiten) PDF als Volltext Verfügbarkeit
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
ISSN	0749-596X
DOI	10.1016/j.jml.2007.12.002
Schlagwörter	Reading Comprehension; Sentences; Serial Ordering; Memory; Language Processing; Recall (Psychology); Eye Movements; Task Analysis + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Leseverstehen; Sentence analysis; Satzanalyse; Ordnen; Ordnungsstruktur; Ordnungssystem; Gedächtnis; Sprachverarbeitung; Abberufung; Augenbewegung; Aufgabenanalyse
Abstract	A sentence is readily understood and recalled when presented one word at a time using rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP) at 10 words/s [Potter, M. C. (1984). Rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP): A method for studying language processing. In D. Kieras & M. Just (Eds.), "New methods in reading comprehension research" (pp. 91-118). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.]. In contrast, selecting just two colored letters at 10 letters/s results in easy detection of the first target but poor recall for the second when it appears 200-500 ms later. This attentional blink disappears when all letters must be reported; instead, performance drops more gradually over serial position [Nieuwenstein, M. R., & Potter, M. C. (2006). Temporal limits of selection and memory encoding: A comparison of whole versus partial report in rapid serial visual presentation. "Psychological Science," 17, 471-475.]. Would target words in sentences escape an attentional blink? Subjects either reported two target words (in red or uppercase) or the whole 10-word sentence. There was a blink for Target 2 in partial report, but that target was easily remembered in whole report. With scrambled sentences whole report dropped but partial report was unaffected, again showing a blink. The attentional blink is not due to memory processing of Target 1, but to target selection, which is incompatible with sentence processing. (Author).
Anmerkungen	Elsevier. 6277 Sea Harbor Drive, Orlando, FL 32887-4800. Tel: 877-839-7126; Tel: 407-345-4020; Fax: 407-363-1354; e-mail: usjcs@elsevier.com; Web site: http://www.elsevier.com
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update	2017/4/10