Literaturnachweis - Detailanzeige
Autor/inn/en | Rith-Najarian, Leslie R.; Chorpita, Bruce F.; Gong-Guy, Elizabeth; Hammons, Hayley R.; Chavira, Denise A. |
---|---|
Titel | Feasibility of a Web-Based Program for Universal Prevention of Anxiety and Depression in University Students: An Open Trial |
Quelle | In: Journal of American College Health, 70 (2022) 8, S.2519-2526 (8 Seiten)
PDF als Volltext |
Zusatzinformation | ORCID (Rith-Najarian, Leslie R.) |
Sprache | englisch |
Dokumenttyp | gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz |
ISSN | 0744-8481 |
DOI | 10.1080/07448481.2020.1869749 |
Schlagwörter | Mental Health; Prevention; Anxiety; Depression (Psychology); College Students; Skill Development; Metacognition; Behavior; Recruitment; Persistence; Program Effectiveness; Online Courses; Web Based Instruction; Student Characteristics; Feedback (Response); Student Attitudes; California Psychohygiene; Prävention; Vorbeugung; Angst; Collegestudent; Kompetenzentwicklung; Qualifikationsentwicklung; Meta cognitive ability; Meta-cognition; Metakognitive Fähigkeit; Metakognition; Recruiting; Rekrutierung; Ausdauer; Online course; Online-Kurs; Web Based Training; Schülerverhalten; Kalifornien |
Abstract | Objective: To examine the feasibility of a self-guided, Web-based program for universal prevention of anxiety and depression in university students. Participants: University students (n = 651) enrolled in the tested program (March, 2016). Methods: The program delivered eight weeks of mental health skills (e.g., behavioral activation, mindfulness). Data was collected online through an entry survey, weekly check-in surveys, and a post-program feedback survey. Results: Campus-wide recruitment emails were the most encountered recruitment strategy (82%). In terms of adherence, the program was initiated by 73% of students and fully completed by 11% of students. There was some evidence of program acceptability (e.g., 71% of students endorsed the program as "useful"). Common qualitative themes further suggested acceptability for some aspects of the program while also highlighting others for revision. Conclusion: Findings support further development of the online program and recommendations are made for improving the platform before future testing. (As Provided). |
Anmerkungen | Taylor & Francis. Available from: Taylor & Francis, Ltd. 530 Walnut Street Suite 850, Philadelphia, PA 19106. Tel: 800-354-1420; Tel: 215-625-8900; Fax: 215-207-0050; Web site: http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals |
Erfasst von | ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC |
Update | 2024/1/01 |