Literaturnachweis - Detailanzeige
Autor/inn/en | Polanin, Joshua R.; Pigott, Terri D.; Espelage, Dorothy L.; Grotpeter, Jennifer K. |
---|---|
Titel | Best Practice Guidelines for Abstract Screening Large-Evidence Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses |
Quelle | In: Research Synthesis Methods, 10 (2019) 3, S.330-342 (13 Seiten)Infoseite zur Zeitschrift
PDF als Volltext |
Zusatzinformation | ORCID (Polanin, Joshua R.) Weitere Informationen |
Sprache | englisch |
Dokumenttyp | gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz |
ISSN | 1759-2879 |
DOI | 10.1002/jrsm.1354 |
Schlagwörter | Meta Analysis; Citations (References); Documentation; Databases; Guidelines; Best Practices; Selection Criteria |
Abstract | Abstract screening is one important aspect of conducting a high-quality and comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis. Abstract screening allows the review team to conduct the tedious but vital first step to synthesize the extant literature: winnowing down the overwhelming amalgamation of citations discovered through research databases to the citations that should be "full-text" screened and eventually included in the review. Although it is a critical process, few guidelines have been put forth since the publications of seminal systematic review textbooks. The purpose of this paper, therefore, is to provide a practical set of best practice guidelines to help future review teams and managers. Each of the 10 proposed guidelines is explained using real-world examples or illustrations from applications. We also delineate recent experiences where a team of abstract screeners double-screened 14,923 abstracts in 89 days. (As Provided). |
Anmerkungen | Wiley-Blackwell. 350 Main Street, Malden, MA 02148. Tel: 800-835-6770; Tel: 781-388-8598; Fax: 781-388-8232; e-mail: cs-journals@wiley.com; Web site: http://www.wiley.com/WileyCDA |
Erfasst von | ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC |
Update | 2024/1/01 |