Review of EEF Projects. Evaluation Report

Autor/inn/en	Demack, Sean; Maxwell, Bronwen; Coldwell, Mike; Stevens, Anna; Wolstenholme, Claire; Reaney-Wood, Sarah; Stiell, Bernadette; Lortie-Forgues, Hugues
Institution	Education Endowment Foundation (EEF) (United Kingdom); Sheffield Hallam University (United Kingdom), Sheffield Institute of Education (SIoE)
Titel	Review of EEF Projects. Evaluation Report
Quelle	(2021), (186 Seiten) PDF als Volltext kostenfreie Datei Verfügbarkeit
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Monographie
Schlagwörter	Foreign Countries; Disadvantaged Youth; Meta Analysis; Effect Size; Program Evaluation; Randomized Controlled Trials; Evaluation Methods; Elementary School Students; Secondary School Students; Cost Effectiveness; Student Attrition; Grants; Intervention; Educational Theories; Evidence Based Practice; Program Implementation; Fidelity; Educational Attainment; United Kingdom (England) + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Ausland; Benachteiligter Jugendlicher; Meta-analysis; Metaanalyse; Programme evaluation; Programmevaluation; Sekundarschüler; Kosten-Nutzen-Analyse; Kosten-Nutzen-Denken; Schülerbeurlaubung; Grant; Finanzielle Beihilfe; Educational theory; Theory of education; Bildungstheorie; Bildungsabschluss; Bildungsgut
Abstract	This report presents findings from exploratory, descriptive meta-analyses of effect sizes reported by the first 82 EEF evaluations that used a randomised controlled trial (RCT) or clustered RCT impact evaluation design published up to January 2019. The review used a theoretical framework derived from literature with five overarching themes to group explanatory variables: (1) Intervention; (2) Implementation & fidelity; (3) Theory & evidence; (4) Context; and (5) Evaluation design. Meta-analyses of effect sizes reported for intention-to-treat (ITT) analyses of primary attainment outcomes, ITT analyses of secondary attainment outcomes and free school meals (FSM) subsample analyses of primary or secondary attainment outcomes are reported. Effect sizes reported for psychological outcomes were also examined but not included in the meta-analyses because of the distinct and diverse nature of these outcomes. Also presented are findings from trial/evaluation-level descriptive analyses of cost effectiveness of interventions and overall pupil-level attrition. [For "Review of EEF Projects. Summary of Key Findings," see ED625481. For "Review of EEF Projects. Technical Annex," see ED625484. For "Review: Scale-Up of EEF Efficacy Trials to Effectiveness Trials," see ED625479. For "Review: EEF Implementation and Process Evaluation (IPE) Quality Pilot," see ED625478.] (ERIC).
Anmerkungen	Education Endowment Foundation. 9th Floor Millbank Tower, Millbank, London, SW1P 4QP, UK. Tel: +44-207-802-1676; e-mail: info@eefoundation.org.uk; Web site: https://educationendowmentfoundation.org.uk/
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update	2024/1/01