Literaturnachweis - Detailanzeige
Autor/inn/en | Scrivener, Susan; Hendra, Richard; Redcross, Cindy; Bloom, Dan; Michalopoulos, Charles; Walter, Johanna |
---|---|
Institution | Manpower Demonstration Research Corp., New York, NY. |
Titel | WRP: Final Report on Vermont's Welfare Restructuring Project. |
Quelle | (2002), (88 Seiten)
PDF als Volltext |
Sprache | englisch |
Dokumenttyp | gedruckt; online; Monographie |
Schlagwörter | Adult Education; Cost Effectiveness; Economically Disadvantaged; Eligibility; Employed Parents; Employment; Employment Level; Employment Patterns; Family Work Relationship; Financial Support; Incentives; Program Development; Program Effectiveness; Program Evaluation; Program Implementation; State Programs; Unemployment; Welfare Recipients; Welfare Reform; Welfare Services; Vermont Adult; Adults; Education; Adult basic education; Adult training; Erwachsenenbildung; Kosten-Nutzen-Analyse; Kosten-Nutzen-Denken; Eignung; Dienstverhältnis; Beschäftigungsgrad; Beschäftigungsstruktur; Finanzielle Förderung; Anreiz; Programmplanung; Programme evaluation; Programmevaluation; Regierungsprogramm; Arbeitslosigkeit; Sozialhilfeempfänger; Sozialhilfeempfängerin; Fürsorgeeinrichtung |
Abstract | An evaluation was conducted of Vermont's Welfare Restructuring Project (WRP), one of the earliest statewide welfare reform programs designed to increase work and reduce reliance on welfare. To assess the difference WRP made, parents applying for or receiving cash assistance in Vermont from July 1994 to December 1996 were assigned randomly to one of these three groups: WRP group that received financial work incentives and were subject to work requirements (full WRP group); WRP Incentives Only group that received the incentives but were not subject to the work requirement; and Aid to Needy Families with Children (ANFC) group subject to pre-WRP welfare rules (no incentives or work requirement). Groups were followed for six years, using computerized records and survey methods. Findings indicated the following: (1) the full WRP program increased employment and reduced reliance on cash assistance for single-parent families; (2) WRP had little effect on family income, material hardship, children's school performance, or other family and child outcomes; (3) the program's work requirement was needed to generate impacts--financial incentives alone did not lead to increases in employment or income; (4) WRP increased employment among most subgroups, and increases were largest for the most disadvantaged; (5) very few community service employment positions were needed for the work requirement; (6) it saved money for taxpayers; and (7) WRP did not affect employment, earnings, income, material hardship, or outcomes for children for two-parent families with an unemployed parent. (Contains 26 references.) (YLB) |
Anmerkungen | Manpower Demonstration Research Corporation, 16 East 34 Street, New York, New York 10016 ($12). Tel: 212-532-3200; Web site: http://www.mdrc.org. For full text: http://www.mdrc.org/publications/31/full.pdf. |
Erfasst von | ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC |