Implementation Report. Volume 2. Individual Unit Reports. Arizona Statewide Implementation 1974-75.

Autor/inn/en	Peterson, Don; und weitere
Institution	Mesa Public Schools, AZ. Dept. of Research and Evaluation.
Titel	Implementation Report. Volume 2. Individual Unit Reports. Arizona Statewide Implementation 1974-75.
Quelle	(1975), (199 Seiten)Verfügbarkeit
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; Monographie
Schlagwörter	Bilingual Students; Career Education; Curriculum Development; Curriculum Evaluation; Demography; Elementary Education; Ethnic Distribution; Ethnic Groups; Formative Evaluation; Pilot Projects; Program Attitudes; Program Development; Program Effectiveness; Program Evaluation; Statewide Planning; Statistical Data; Student Attitudes; Teacher Attitudes; Unit Plan; Arizona + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Arbeitslehre; Curriculum; Development; Curriculumentwicklung; Lehrplan; Entwicklung; Evaluation; Curriculumevaluation; Rahmenplan; Evaluierung; Demografie; Elementarunterricht; Ethnie; Pilot project; Modellversuch; Pilotprojekt; Programmplanung; Programme evaluation; Programmevaluation; Planwirtschaft; Schülerverhalten; Lehrerverhalten
Abstract	The document reports on the 1974-75 statewide field test of 13 Arizona-developed career education units; it contains unit-specific implementation data. The units were implemented in 10 projects in different parts of Arizona in order to determine their usability in classrooms throughout the State; units meeting all implementation criteria were then considered ready for large-scale dissemination. Tested were one unit each for grades K, 1, and 2; four units for grade 5; two units for grade 6; and three units for grades 7/8. The doucment is divided into 13 sections, each devoted to an analysis of an individual unit. The format includes:unit description; student demographic data; number of hours devoted to teaching the unit; teaching sequence of lessons; data on perceived unit effectiveness, teacher attitude, and student attitude, presented in tabular form by project; necessary correlation tables; lessons omitted; teacher comments; and recommendations. The data analyzed was from approximately 11,000 students and 331 teachers. Demographic information was analyzed and correlated with other data. (AJ)
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC