Suche

Wo soll gesucht werden?
Erweiterte Literatursuche

Ariadne Pfad:

Inhalt

Literaturnachweis - Detailanzeige

 
Autor/inn/enCook, David A.; Beckman, Thomas J.
TitelDoes Scale Length Matter? A Comparison of Nine- versus Five-Point Rating Scales for the Mini-CEX
QuelleIn: Advances in Health Sciences Education, 14 (2009) 5, S.655-664 (10 Seiten)Infoseite zur Zeitschrift
PDF als Volltext Verfügbarkeit 
Spracheenglisch
Dokumenttypgedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
ISSN1382-4996
DOI10.1007/s10459-008-9147-x
SchlagwörterInterrater Reliability; Rating Scales; Internal Medicine; Test Validity; Video Technology; Medical Students; Medical Education; Educational Assessment; Measures (Individuals); Measurement Techniques; Evaluation Methods; Clinical Teaching (Health Professions); Medical School Faculty; Medical Evaluation; Student Evaluation; Graduate Students
AbstractEducators must often decide how many points to use in a rating scale. No studies have compared interrater reliability for different-length scales, and few have evaluated accuracy. This study sought to evaluate the interrater reliability and accuracy of mini-clinical evaluation exercise (mini-CEX) scores, comparing the traditional mini-CEX nine-point scale to a five-point scale. Methods: The authors conducted a validity study in an academic internal medicine residency program. Fifty-two program faculty participated. Participants rated videotaped resident-patient encounters using the mini-CEX with both a nine-point scale and a five-point scale. Some cases were scripted to reflect a specific level of competence (unsatisfactory, satisfactory, superior). Outcome measures included mini-CEX scores, accuracy (scores compared to scripted competence level), interrater reliability, and domain intercorrelation. Results: Interviewing, exam, counseling, and overall ratings varied significantly across levels of competence (P less than 0.0001). Nine-point scale scores accurately classified competence more often (391/720 [54%] for overall ratings) than five-point scores (316/723 [44%], P less than 0.0001). Interrater reliability was similar for scores from the nine- and five-point scales (0.43 and 0.40, respectively, for overall ratings). With the exception of correlation between exam and counseling scores using the five-point scale (r = 0.38, P = 0.13), score correlations among all domain combinations were high (r = 0.46-0.89) and statistically significant (P [less than or equal to] 0.015) for both scales. Conclusions: Mini-CEX scores demonstrated modest interrater reliability and accuracy. Although interrater reliability is similar for nine- and five-point scales, nine-point scales appear to provide more accurate scores. This has implications for many educational assessments. (As Provided).
AnmerkungenSpringer. 233 Spring Street, New York, NY 10013. Tel: 800-777-4643; Tel: 212-460-1500; Fax: 212-348-4505; e-mail: service-ny@springer.com; Web site: http://www.springerlink.com
Erfasst vonERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update2017/4/10
Literaturbeschaffung und Bestandsnachweise in Bibliotheken prüfen
 

Standortunabhängige Dienste
Bibliotheken, die die Zeitschrift "Advances in Health Sciences Education" besitzen:
Link zur Zeitschriftendatenbank (ZDB)

Artikellieferdienst der deutschen Bibliotheken (subito):
Übernahme der Daten in das subito-Bestellformular

Tipps zum Auffinden elektronischer Volltexte im Video-Tutorial

Trefferlisten Einstellungen

Permalink als QR-Code

Permalink als QR-Code

Inhalt auf sozialen Plattformen teilen (nur vorhanden, wenn Javascript eingeschaltet ist)

Teile diese Seite: