Assessment for Learner Self-Regulation: Enhancing Achievement in the First Year Using Learning Technologies

Autor/in	Nicol, David
Titel	Assessment for Learner Self-Regulation: Enhancing Achievement in the First Year Using Learning Technologies
Quelle	In: Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 34 (2009) 3, S.335-352 (18 Seiten)Infoseite zur Zeitschrift PDF als Volltext Verfügbarkeit
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
ISSN	0260-2938
Schlagwörter	Feedback (Response); College Freshmen; Formative Evaluation; Metacognition; Skill Development; Guidelines; Introductory Courses; French; Psychology; Educational Change; Student Attitudes; Student Evaluation; Foreign Countries; Case Studies; Teaching Methods; Program Descriptions; United Kingdom + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Studienanfänger; Meta cognitive ability; Meta-cognition; Metakognitive Fähigkeit; Metakognition; Kompetenzentwicklung; Qualifikationsentwicklung; Richtlinien; Einführungskurs; Französisch; Psychologie; Bildungsreform; Schülerverhalten; Schulnote; Studentische Bewertung; Ausland; Case study; Fallstudie; Case Study; Teaching method; Lehrmethode; Unterrichtsmethode; Großbritannien
Abstract	While there is considerable research on the first-year experience, much less has been written about the impact of assessment and feedback practices on that experience. This paper explores how formative assessment and feedback might be used to enhance the first-year experience and enable students to develop the skills needed for self-regulated learning. It also explores how technology might support formative assessment practices in the current higher education context, where modularisation, larger student numbers and lower staff-student ratios have all reduced opportunities for formative support. A framework is proposed for the design of large-cohort first-year courses based on two recent literature reviews. This provides a lens through which to analyse two first-year courses (Psychology and French) that were redesigned with funding from the Re-engineering Assessment Practices (REAP) project. Evaluations show that both course redesigns resulted in high levels of student satisfaction, in performance improvements in final exams when compared with previous years and in workload efficiency gains brought about by the application of technology. Ways of improving on these designs based on the proposed framework are discussed. (Contains 4 tables.) (As Provided).
Anmerkungen	Routledge. Available from: Taylor & Francis, Ltd. 325 Chestnut Street Suite 800, Philadelphia, PA 19106. Tel: 800-354-1420; Fax: 215-625-2940; Web site: http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update	2017/4/10