Literaturnachweis - Detailanzeige
Autor/in | Dyehouse, Jeremiah |
---|---|
Titel | Knowledge Consolidation Analysis: Toward a Methodology for Studying the Role of Argument in Technology Development |
Quelle | In: Written Communication, 24 (2007) 2, S.111-139 (29 Seiten)
PDF als Volltext |
Sprache | englisch |
Dokumenttyp | gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz |
ISSN | 0741-0883 |
DOI | 10.1177/0741088306298736 |
Schlagwörter | Methods; Essays; Rhetorical Criticism; Case Studies; Rhetorical Theory; Persuasive Discourse |
Abstract | Researchers studying technology development often examine how rhetorical activity contributes to technologies' design, implementation, and stabilization. This article offers a possible methodology for studying one role of rhetorical activity in technology development: knowledge consolidation analysis. Applying this method to an exemplar case, the author describes how explanations of Project Essay Grade (PEG), the first initiative to computerize student essay assessment, made knowledge available about this technology project. More specifically, technologist Ellis Page and his coauthors reworked a key explanatory argument, a justification of PEG's functioning, during the course of several decades, refining and clarifying its key contrasts and strengthening its presentation for generalist educators in particular. Analysis suggests that late presentations of the argument reveal that knowledge was successfully consolidated about a technical procedure Page and his coauthors called "rating simulation." The conclusion discusses the key advantages and limitations of the method. (Contains 1 figure and 4 notes.) (Author). |
Anmerkungen | SAGE Publications. 2455 Teller Road, Thousand Oaks, CA 91320. Tel: 800-818-7243; Tel: 805-499-9774; Fax: 800-583-2665; e-mail: journals@sagepub.com; Web site: http://sagepub.com |
Erfasst von | ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC |
Update | 2017/4/10 |