Metacognitive Differentiation of Item Memory and Source Memory in Schema-Based Source Monitoring

Autor/inn/en	Schaper, Marie Luisa; Kuhlmann, Beatrice G.; Bayen, Ute J.
Titel	Metacognitive Differentiation of Item Memory and Source Memory in Schema-Based Source Monitoring
Quelle	In: Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 49 (2023) 5, S.743-765 (23 Seiten) PDF als Volltext Verfügbarkeit
Zusatzinformation	ORCID (Schaper, Marie Luisa) ORCID (Kuhlmann, Beatrice G.) ORCID (Bayen, Ute J.)
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
ISSN	0278-7393
DOI	10.1037/xlm0001207
Schlagwörter	Memory; Metacognition; Schemata (Cognition); Prediction; Decision Making; Comparative Analysis; Semantics; Priming; Cues; Foreign Countries; German; Item Analysis; Test Items; Adults; Germany + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Gedächtnis; Meta cognitive ability; Meta-cognition; Metakognitive Fähigkeit; Metakognition; Cognition; Schema; Kognition; Vorhersage; Decision-making; Entscheidungsfindung; Semantik; Stichwort; Ausland; Deutscher; Itemanalyse; Test content; Testaufgabe; Deutschland
Abstract	Item memory and source memory are different aspects of episodic remembering. To investigate metamemory differences between them, the authors assessed systematic differences between predictions of item memory via Judgments of Learning (JOLs) and source memory via Judgments of Source (JOSs). Schema-based expectations affect JOLs and JOSs differently: Judgments are higher for expected source-item pairs (e.g., "nightstand in the bedroom") than unexpected pairs (e.g., "bed in the bathroom"), but this expectancy effect is stronger on JOSs than JOLs (Schaper et al., 2019b). The current study tested theoretical underpinnings of this difference. Due to semantic priming, JOLs should be influenced by the consistency between an item and "any of the schemas" activated at study. JOSs, however, should be influenced by the (in)consistency between an item and its "actual source." In three experiments, source-item pairs varied in strength of consistency and inconsistency. Participants provided item-wise JOLs and JOSs. Regardless of an items' actual source, JOLs were higher the more consistent an item was with any of the source schemas, but only if that schema was activated by occurring as a source at study. JOLs were also biased by the actual source: JOLs were lower the more inconsistent an item was with its actual source. By contrast, JOSs were primarily influenced by an item's (in)consistency with its actual source (positively for consistency, negatively for inconsistency). Thus, participants metacognitively differentiated item memory and source memory. (As Provided).
Anmerkungen	American Psychological Association. Journals Department, 750 First Street NE, Washington, DC 20002. Tel: 800-374-2721; Tel: 202-336-5510; Fax: 202-336-5502; e-mail: order@apa.org; Web site: http://www.apa.org
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update	2024/1/01