Linguistic Barriers among Internationally Educated Teachers in Ireland and Canada: A Critical Comparative Analysis

Autor/inn/en	Schmidt, Clea; McDaid, Rory
Titel	Linguistic Barriers among Internationally Educated Teachers in Ireland and Canada: A Critical Comparative Analysis
Quelle	In: Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 38 (2015) 3, S.172-183 (12 Seiten) PDF als Volltext Verfügbarkeit
Sprache	englisch
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
ISSN	0155-0640
Schlagwörter	Barriers; Second Language Learning; Language Proficiency; Teacher Education; Comparative Analysis; Monolingualism; Qualitative Research; Focus Groups; Employment; Hidden Curriculum; Foreign Countries; Migration; Multilingualism; Linguistic Competence; Educational Policy; Immigrants; Immigration; Foreign Nationals; Teacher Selection; Selection Criteria; Semi Structured Interviews; Canada; Ireland + Suchen Sie Ihr Suchwort? Zweitsprachenerwerb; Language skill; Language skills; Sprachkompetenz; Lehrerausbildung; Lehrerbildung; Qualitative Forschung; Dienstverhältnis; Heimlicher Lehrplan; Ausland; Mehrsprachigkeit; Multilingualismus; Politics of education; Bildungspolitik; Immigrant; Immigrantin; Immigranten; Ausländer; Ausländerin; Selection criterion; Auslesekriterium; Kanada; Irland
Abstract	Drawing on qualitative interview and focus group data collected from Internationally Educated Teachers (IETs) in the context of two different research studies conducted in Ireland and Manitoba, Canada, this article critically examines how national/regional linguistic requirements and expectations of a hidden curriculum are experienced as barriers to employment and as status inhibitors. While the two sites contrast starkly in terms of size, migration frameworks, and population demographics, some IETs are faced with comparable barriers in terms of securing work in their field in both countries. We make two main arguments on the basis of our findings: (1) language proficiency requirements for IETs should be accompanied by appropriate language supports, and (2) education systems must move beyond viewing language within a monolingual framework to avoid devaluing the rich linguistic repertoires of IETs who are multilingual. Analysis draws on the concept of plurilingualism to advocate for a more complex and inclusive approach to defining linguistic competence for teachers. Further, the theoretical lens of language ecology usefully emphasises the wider linguistic context that should be taken into account when designing and implementing policy and programming for IETs. Implications of this research illuminate the ways power and linguistic identity intersect in international education systems. (As Provided).
Anmerkungen	Applied Linguistics Association of Australia. e-mail: info@alaa.org.au; Web site: http://www.alaa.org.au/page/aral_journal.html
Erfasst von	ERIC (Education Resources Information Center), Washington, DC
Update	2020/1/01